These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Time-compressed speech discrimination in children and its relationship to articulation. Orchik DJ; Oelschlaeger ML J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 3(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 893199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Discrimination and critical signal to noise ratio of normal and pathological hearing (author's transl)]. von Wedel H Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1977 Feb; 56(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 139521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Whole-word scoring versus phoneme scoring in speech audiometry. Markides A Br J Audiol; 1978 May; 12(2):40-6. PubMed ID: 667394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Correlations between word intelligibility under reverberation and speech auditory brainstem responses in elderly listeners. Fujihira H; Shiraishi K Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Jan; 126(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 24906808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Kalikow DN; Stevens KN; Elliott LL J Acoust Soc Am; 1977 May; 61(5):1337-51. PubMed ID: 881487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of voiced speech parameters on the intelligibility of PB words. Agrawal A; Lin WC J Acoust Soc Am; 1975 Jan; 57(1):217-22. PubMed ID: 1110285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Comment on "Interaural alternation, information load, and speech intelligibility" (J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 57, 1219-1220 (1975)). Speaks C J Acoust Soc Am; 1976 Jul; 60(1):272-8. PubMed ID: 956532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Audiometric test for determination of the central display in speech understanding]. Schlöndorff G; Tegtneier W Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1971 Sep; 50(9):663-7. PubMed ID: 5093610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Performance of normal-hearing listeners on the time-compressed modified rhyme test. Schwartz DM; Mikus B J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 893195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of spatially separated sound sources on speech intelligibility. Dirks DD; Wilson RH J Speech Hear Res; 1969 Mar; 12(1):5-38. PubMed ID: 5779912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Relationship between speech sound discrimination skills and language abilities of kindergarten children. Perozzi JA; Kunze LH J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):382-90. PubMed ID: 5558094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of speech detection and spondee thresholds and half- versus full-list intelligibility scores with MLV and taped presentations of NU-6. Beattie RC; Svihovec DA; Edgerton BJ J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(6):267-72. PubMed ID: 681199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Methodological improvements in the assessment of phonological discrimination in children. Kamil ML; Rudegeair RE Child Dev; 1972 Sep; 43(3):1087-91. PubMed ID: 5056603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The intelligibility of whitened and peak clipped speech. Young LL; Goodman JT; Carhart R J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(4):167-71. PubMed ID: 659288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effects of auditory-visual vowel identification training on speech recognition under difficult listening conditions. Richie C; Kewley-Port D J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 51(6):1607-19. PubMed ID: 18695021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]