These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4448957)

  • 1. Precategorical selective attention and tonal specificity in auditory recognition.
    Hawkins HL; Thomas GB; Presson JC; Cozic A; Brookmire D
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 Sep; 103(3):530-8. PubMed ID: 4448957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attention and processing capacity in auditory recognition.
    Moore JJ; Massaro DW
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Jun; 99(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 4714081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual units in speech recognition.
    Massaro DW
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 Feb; 102(2):199-208. PubMed ID: 4811941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. II. Selective attention and learning under various levels of stimulus uncertainty.
    Watson CS; Kelly WJ; Wroton HW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1976 Nov; 60(5):1176-86. PubMed ID: 977844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Components of the familiarity effect in tachistoscopic recognition.
    Butler B
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Dec; 101(2):367-72. PubMed ID: 4753862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Change deafness and the organizational properties of sounds.
    Gregg MK; Samuel AG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):974-91. PubMed ID: 18665739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of central processing on auditory recognition.
    Massaro DW; Kahn BJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Jan; 97(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 4704196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target discrimination by informative auditory cuing.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20580658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of masking tasks on differential eyelid conditioning: a distinction between knowledge of stimulus contingencies and attentional or cognitive activities involving them.
    Nelson MN; Ross LE
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 Jan; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 4809655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is visual attention required for robust picture memory?
    Wolfe JM; Horowitz TS; Michod KO
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(7):955-64. PubMed ID: 17306854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory and visual contributions to the perception of consonants.
    Binnie CA; Montgomery AA; Jackson PL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Dec; 17(4):619-30. PubMed ID: 4444283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Processing capacity in a letter-matching task.
    Comstock EM
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Sep; 100(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 4744501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integration of featural information in speech perception.
    Oden GC; Massaro DW
    Psychol Rev; 1978 May; 85(3):172-91. PubMed ID: 663005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load.
    Santangelo V; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1311-21. PubMed ID: 18085945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interference with visualization.
    Phillips WA; Christie DF
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1977 Nov; 29(4):637-50. PubMed ID: 601182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory psychophysics.
    Plomp R
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1975; 26():207-32. PubMed ID: 1094927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binaural release from masking in forward-masked intensity discrimination: evidence for effects of selective attention.
    Oberfeld D; Stahn P; Kuta M
    Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 294(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 23010335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of priming on release from informational masking is equivalent for younger and older adults.
    Ezzatian P; Li L; Pichora-Fuller K; Schneider B
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 21178568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of forward versus backward recognition masking.
    Massaro DW
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Oct; 100(2):434-6. PubMed ID: 4745469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanisms of auditory backward masking in the stimulus suffix effect.
    Crowder RG
    Psychol Rev; 1978 Nov; 85(6):502-24. PubMed ID: 734019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.