These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4448957)

  • 21. Reaction time as a measure of the effect of selective attention.
    Flaherty EW; Coren S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Oct; 39(2):755-61. PubMed ID: 4453491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Moray vs. the rest: the effects of extended shadowing practice.
    Underwood G
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1974 Aug; 26(Pt3):368-72. PubMed ID: 4414715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sounds change four-dot masking.
    Vroomen J; Keetels M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 19012870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Control of working memory: effects of attention training on target recognition and distractor salience in an auditory selection task.
    Melara RD; Tong Y; Rao A
    Brain Res; 2012 Jan; 1430():68-77. PubMed ID: 22099165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Temporally pre-presented lipreading cues release speech from informational masking.
    Wu C; Cao S; Wu X; Li L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):EL281-5. PubMed ID: 23556692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of acoustic confusability on visual search.
    Krueger LE
    Am J Psychol; 1970 Sep; 83(3):389-400. PubMed ID: 5478856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Auditory codability and the short-term retention of visual information.
    Nickerson RS
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Oct; 95(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 5071917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Task-dependent transfer of perceptual to memory representations during delayed spatial frequency discrimination.
    Lalonde J; Chaudhuri A
    Vision Res; 2002 Jun; 42(14):1759-69. PubMed ID: 12127108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Arousal and the range of cue utilization.
    Bacon SJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 Jan; 102(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 4809659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Selective attention and the auditory vertex potential. Effects of signal intensity and masking noise.
    Schwent VL; Hillyard SA; Galambos R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1976 Jun; 40(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 57047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A categorically postcategorical interpretation of the modality effect: a reply to Nilsson.
    Watkins MJ; Watkins OC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 Nov; 1(6):733-5. PubMed ID: 1185115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Changes of auditory word discrimination induced by inversion of the visual field.
    Cegalis JA; Murdza S
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1976 Jun; 85(3):318-23. PubMed ID: 932318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features.
    Wang MD; Bilger RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1973 Nov; 54(5):1248-66. PubMed ID: 4765809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Parellel and serial processing in tachistoscopic recognition: two mechanisms.
    Dick AO
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Nov; 96(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 5083131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Tactile discrimination of competing sounds.
    Richardson BL; Wuillemin DB; Saunders FJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1978 Dec; 24(6):546-50. PubMed ID: 750999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of masking-spectrum slope and interaural phase on detection of tones.
    Sonn M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 4842432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Word discrimination in the presence of competing speech with children.
    Chermak GD; Zielonko B
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 2(5):188-92. PubMed ID: 856780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Status of spatial location in auditory sensory memory: evidence from rapidly presented lists.
    Odgers RP; Colle HA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Sep; 6(5):546-57. PubMed ID: 7430969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Acoustic detail guides attention allocation in a selective listening task.
    Wöstmann M; Schröger E; Obleser J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 25390200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Auditory perceptual load: A review.
    Murphy S; Spence C; Dalton P
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 352():40-48. PubMed ID: 28189838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.