These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4451211)

  • 1. The 'golden section': an artifact of stimulus range and measure of preference.
    Godkewitsch M
    Am J Psychol; 1974; 87(1-2):269-77. PubMed ID: 4451211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The 'golden rectangle': some new data.
    Benjafield J
    Am J Psychol; 1976 Dec; 89(4):737-43. PubMed ID: 1020768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The 'golden section': an artifact of stimulus range and demand characteristics.
    Piehl J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Aug; 43(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 958835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The golden section hypothesis.
    Plug C
    Am J Psychol; 1980 Sep; 93(3):467-87. PubMed ID: 7212127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Authoritarianism and esthetic preferences. Empirical invesigations with a Figure Preference Test].
    Schneider JF
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1978; 131(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 755461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The aesthetics of simple figures.
    McManus IC
    Br J Psychol; 1980 Nov; 71(Pt 4):505-24. PubMed ID: 7437674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consistency in the expression of aesthetic preference in line partitioning.
    Macrosson WD; Strachan GC
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 2):1151-4. PubMed ID: 9229427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early interactions between orienting, visual sampling and decision making in facial preference.
    Simion C; Shimojo S
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(20):3331-5. PubMed ID: 16765404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrast effects in the response to art.
    Lindauer MS; Dintruff DD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Feb; 40(1):155-64. PubMed ID: 1118254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cognitive correlates of pleasure of visual complexity].
    Wiedl KH
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1976; 128(3-4):193-209. PubMed ID: 1028392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aesthetic preferences for the unity ratio resist the influence of color illusions.
    Davis ST
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(1):47-71. PubMed ID: 17444360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanisms of feature- and space-based attention: response modulation and baseline increases.
    McMains SA; Fehd HM; Emmanouil TA; Kastner S
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 98(4):2110-21. PubMed ID: 17671104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sex differences in pattern copying: spatial cues or motor skills?
    Vasta R; Regan KG; Kerley J
    Child Dev; 1980 Sep; 51(3):932-4. PubMed ID: 7418519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task.
    Johansson P; Hall L; Sikström S; Olsson A
    Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5745):116-9. PubMed ID: 16210542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial choices of macaque monkeys based on the visual representation of the response space: rotation of the stimuli.
    Nedvidek J; Nekovarova T; Bures J
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 193(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 18588916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cultural deprivation and the relative preferences of preschool children for complex and novel stimuli.
    Hicks RA; Parker-Schumacher M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Jun; 42(3):972-4. PubMed ID: 1272744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of visual preferences in cats.
    Emerson VF; Timney B
    Perception; 1977; 6(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 876820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Taking the easy way out: preference diversity, decision strategies, and decision refusal in groups.
    Nijstad BA; Kaps SC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 May; 94(5):860-70. PubMed ID: 18444743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlated changes in perceptions of the gender and orientation of ambiguous biological motion figures.
    Brooks A; Schouten B; Troje NF; Verfaillie K; Blanke O; van der Zwan R
    Curr Biol; 2008 Sep; 18(17):R728-R729. PubMed ID: 18786367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison between traditional economical and demand curve analyses of relative reinforcer efficacy in the validation of preference assessment predictions.
    Reed DD; Luiselli JK; Magnuson JD; Fillers S; Vieira S; Rue HC
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2009 Jun; 12(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 19466625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.