These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [Asymmetry of visual perception]. Kostandov EA; Reshchikova TN; Shostakovich GS; Genkina OA Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1977; 27(3):545-52. PubMed ID: 899258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interhemispheric asymmetries in the visual evoked response: effects of stimulus lateralisation and task. Rugg MD; Beaumont JG Biol Psychol; 1978 Jun; 6(4):283-92. PubMed ID: 708813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonverbal fixation control in young children induces a left-field advantage in digit recall. Kershner J; Thomae R; Callaway R Neuropsychologia; 1977; 15(4-5):569-76. PubMed ID: 896013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Superior recall of letters in the right visual field with bilateral presentation and partial report. Rosen JJ; Curcio F; Mackavey W; Hebert J Cortex; 1975 Jun; 11(2):144-54. PubMed ID: 1149473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laterality differences in recognition of kana and kanji words. Shimizu A; Endo M Acta Neurol (Napoli); 1981 Dec; 3(6):705-20. PubMed ID: 7039245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Asymmetry of visual perception and interhemispheric interaction. Kostandov EA Neurosci Behav Physiol; 1980; 10(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 7383323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cerebral lateralization and spatial ability. Levy J Behav Genet; 1976 Apr; 6(2):171-88. PubMed ID: 1267738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Handedness and sex differences in the processing manner of verbal and spatial information. Nagae S Am J Psychol; 1985; 98(3):409-20. PubMed ID: 4051039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recognition of Japanese kanji in the left and right visual fields. Hatta T Neuropsychologia; 1977; 15(4-5):685-8. PubMed ID: 896024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Laterality and sex differences for visual recognition of emotional and non-emotional words. Graves R; Landis T; Goodglass H Neuropsychologia; 1981; 19(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 7231670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Does cerebral dominance offer a sufficient explanation for laterality differences in tachistoscopic recognition? White MJ Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Apr; 36(2):479-85. PubMed ID: 4690737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Hemispheric differences in serial versus parallel precessing. Cohen G J Exp Psychol; 1973 Mar; 97(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 4705242 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Recognition of verbs, abstract nouns and concrete nouns from the left and right visual half-fields. Hines D Neuropsychologia; 1976; 14(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 934455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Functional asymmetry of visual fields for Japanese words in kana (syllable-based) writing and random shape-recognition in Japanese subjects. Endo M; Shimizu A; Hori T Neuropsychologia; 1978; 16(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 703943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Tachistoscopic recognition of line orientation. Sasanuma S; Kobayashi Y Neuropsychologia; 1978; 16(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 692850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual evoked response correlates of cerebral specialization after human commissurotomy. Gott PS; Rossiter VS; Galbraith GC; Saul RE Biol Psychol; 1977 Sep; 5(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 922081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Interhemispheric interaction during direct and reverse contralateral masking of visual stimuli in man]. Aftanas LI Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1986; 36(2):385-7. PubMed ID: 3716606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]