These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4453198)
1. The insanity defense: an uncertain future. Allen RC MH; 1974; 58(4):4-7. PubMed ID: 4453198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reflections on current proposals to abolish or reform the insanity defense. Arenella P Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(3):271-84. PubMed ID: 7168452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Legal outcome and clinical findings: a study of insanity evaluations. Rogers R; Cavanaugh JL; Seman W; Harris M Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 6713107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The meaning of mental illness in criminal responsibility. Slovenko R J Leg Med; 1984 Mar; 5(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 6373991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical issues in forensic psychiatry: from an attorney's perspective. Weiner BA Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 6478068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of forensic psychiatry and the insanity defense. Schell-King M; Finneran MR Perspect Psychiatr Care; 1982; 20(2):54-64. PubMed ID: 6923186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Disposition of insanity defense cases in Oregon. Bloom JL; Bloom JD Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 7317657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Practical ethical problems of the forensic psychiatrist in dealing with attorneys. Sadoff RL Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 6478067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus. Cobun LS Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):471-500. PubMed ID: 6486122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The insanity defense: why it should be retained. Sadoff RL J Leg Med (N Y); 1977 Jun; 5(6):31-3. PubMed ID: 301165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Guilty but mentally ill: a retreat from the insanity defense. Sherman SL Am J Law Med; 1981; 7(2):237-64. PubMed ID: 7304614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Insanity defense continues to draw attention in Washington, state capitols. Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1983 Jan; 34(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 6826158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The empirical jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court. Appelbaum PS Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2-3):335-49. PubMed ID: 3505417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The historical development of insanity as a defense in criminal actions. II. Lewinstein SR J Forensic Sci; 1969 Oct; 14(4):469-500. PubMed ID: 4900615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychiatrists in court: some perspectives on the insanity defense. Goldstein AS Am J Psychiatry; 1969 Apr; 125(10):1348-51. PubMed ID: 4886241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Isaac Ray and forensic psychiatry in the United States. Payne H; Luthe R Forensic Sci Int; 1980; 15(2):115-27. PubMed ID: 6987135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Forensic psychiatry, its place and its promise. Bromberg W Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 8054668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. United States v. Lyons: toward a new conception of legal insanity. Mossman D Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 3365479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]