These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. [Education and training of personnel in the clean rooms. Examination from the viewpoint of the microbiologist]. Zuger A Swiss Dent; 1983; 4(1-2):27-8, 29-30, 33-5. PubMed ID: 6408766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The media fill (simulation) test is the best method to evaluate aseptic processing. Kawamura K PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2002; 56(2):57-8. PubMed ID: 11977403 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Microbiological aspects of the pharmaceutical environment]. Buogo A; Guerrato G; Giulioni A; Papakristo G Boll Chim Farm; 1979 Jan; 118(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 454532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Device for sampling and feeding under aseptic conditions]. Matveev VE; Skvortsov GE; Eĭromdzhants AV; Iakimov PT Antibiotiki; 1980 Feb; 25(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 7356311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Microbiological in-process control in drug manufacture]. Seyfarth VH Arzneimittelforschung; 1985; 35(1A):205-16. PubMed ID: 4039162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the BioVigilant IMD-A, a novel optical spectroscopy technology for the continuous and real-time environmental monitoring of viable and nonviable particles. Part II. Case studies in environmental monitoring during aseptic filling, intervention assessments, and glove integrity testing in manufacturing isolators. Miller MJ; Walsh MR; Shrake JL; Dukes RE; Hill DB PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2009; 63(3):259-83. PubMed ID: 20069799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Use of aseptic environment in clinical hematology (review)]. Bláha M; Vanásek J; Mĕrka V; Mazák J; Hrncír Z; Erichleb M; Splino M; Stroký O Vnitr Lek; 1976 Mar; 22(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 772951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Interaction between air movements and the dispersion of contaminants: clean zones with unidirectional air flow. Ljungqvist B; Reinmüller B J Parenter Sci Technol; 1993; 47(2):60-9. PubMed ID: 8515346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Control of microbial contamination in the air of rooms for sterile production. Proposals for sampling]. Carazzone M; Fava M Boll Chim Farm; 1981 Jul; 120(7):416-26. PubMed ID: 7317168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Proposal for a new categorization of aseptic processing facilities based on risk assessment scores. Katayama H; Toda A; Tokunaga Y; Katoh S PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2008; 62(4):235-43. PubMed ID: 19174952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Control aspects of aseptically produced products. Avallone HL J Parenter Sci Technol; 1985; 39(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 3989616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Validation and routine operation of a sterile dry powder filling facility. Prout G J Parenter Sci Technol; 1982; 36(5):199-204. PubMed ID: 6927748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Top ten hot topics in parenteral science and technology. Akers MJ; Nail SL; Saffell-Clemmer W PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2007; 61(5):337-61. PubMed ID: 18047174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Prevention of air-borne contamination of instruments for parenteral treatment]. Dragomir M; Novac F; Voiculescu V Viata Med Rev Inf Prof Stiint Cadrelor Medii Sanit; 1982 Apr; 30(4):87-91. PubMed ID: 6814058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Report on survey of current practice employed for sterility test sampling of aseptically filled products. Dilloway KP; Akers JP J Parenter Sci Technol; 1987; 41(6):207-9. PubMed ID: 3437370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Role of packaging in ethylene oxide sterilization. Panella JA Bull Parenter Drug Assoc; 1974; 28(4):188-96. PubMed ID: 4212326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]