These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 445866)

  • 1. Visual classification of banded human chromosomes. III. Classification and karyotyping of density profiles described by band transition sequences.
    Lundsteen C; Granum E
    Clin Genet; 1979 May; 15(5):430-9. PubMed ID: 445866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Description of chromosome banding patterns by band transition sequences: a new basis for automated chromosome analysis.
    Lundsteen C; Granum E
    Clin Genet; 1979 May; 15(5):418-29. PubMed ID: 445865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic chromosome analysis. II. Karyotyping of banded human chromosomes using band transition sequences.
    Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Granum E; Philip J; Philip K
    Clin Genet; 1981 Jan; 19(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 7460378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic chromosome analysis. I. A simple method for classification of B- and D-group chromosomes represented by band transition sequences.
    Lundsteen C; Bjerregaard B; Granum E; Philip J; Philip K
    Clin Genet; 1980; 17(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 7363505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic classification of chromosomes as part of a routine system for clinical analysis.
    Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Maahr J
    Cytometry; 1986 Jan; 7(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 3948602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatically inferred Markov network models for classification of chromosomal band pattern structures.
    Granum E; Thomason MG
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):26-39. PubMed ID: 2307060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual classification of banded human chromosomes ii. classification and karyotyping of integrated density profiles.
    Lundsteen C; Granum E
    Ann Hum Genet; 1977 May; 40(4):431-42. PubMed ID: 879712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stylized chromosome images.
    Martin AO; Isenstein BS; Thomas CW; Rzeszotarski MS; Johnson WE
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 2307061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Band features as classification measures for G-banded chromosome analysis.
    Johnston DA; Tang KS; Zimmerman S
    Comput Biol Med; 1993 Mar; 23(2):115-29. PubMed ID: 8513663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chromosome banding analysis by slit-scan flow cytometry.
    Bartholdi MF; Meyne J; Johnston RG; Cram LS
    Cytometry; 1989 Mar; 10(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 2496955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual classification of banded human chromosomes. I. Karyotyping compared with classification of isolated chromosomes.
    Lundsteen C; Lind AM; Granum E
    Ann Hum Genet; 1976 Jul; 40(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 962325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated chromosome classification limitations due to image processing.
    Stanley R; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1995; 31():183-8. PubMed ID: 7654959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An expert diagnostic system based on neural networks and image analysis techniques in the field of automated cytogenetics.
    Beksaç MS; Eskiizmirliler S; Cakar AN; Erkmen AM; Dağdeviren A; Lundsteen C
    Technol Health Care; 1996 Mar; 3(4):217-29. PubMed ID: 8705397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Homologue matching using the Choquet integral.
    Stanley RJ; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 34():315-20. PubMed ID: 9603059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between G band number and chromosome length from prophase to metaphase.
    Jagielski J; Haus O
    Acta Physiol Pol; 1983; 34(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 6637533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-assisted karyotyping system of banded chromosomes.
    Bruschi C; Tedeschi F; Puglisi PP; Marmiroli N
    Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1981; 29(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 7460628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new chromosome banding technique, spectral color banding (SCAN), for full characterization of chromosomal abnormalities.
    Kakazu N; Bar-Am I; Hada S; Ago H; Abe T
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2003 Aug; 37(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 12800153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aspects of automated chromosome analysis. Different representations of banded human chromosomes and their cytogenetic evaluation.
    Lundsteen C
    Dan Med Bull; 1980 Feb; 27(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 6156802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On fully automatic feature measurement for banded chromosome classification.
    Piper J; Granum E
    Cytometry; 1989 May; 10(3):242-55. PubMed ID: 2714109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of image manipulation on automated karyotyping.
    Stanley RJ; Caldwell CW; Keller J; Gader P
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 33():305-10. PubMed ID: 9731376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.