These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4459626)

  • 1. The use of learning rate, recall and listener confidence ratings to assess effects of acoustically distorted speech stimuli.
    Gilbert HR; Saxman JH
    Lang Speech; 1974; 17(4):337-46. PubMed ID: 4459626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Category superiority effects and the processing of auditory images.
    Sharps MJ; Pollitt BK
    J Gen Psychol; 1998 Apr; 125(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 9778835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of presentation level on memory performance.
    Heinrich A; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 21278574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Background instrumental music and serial recall.
    Nittono H
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 2):1307-13. PubMed ID: 9229452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Irrelevant speech does not interfere with serial recall in early blind listeners.
    Kattner F; Ellermeier W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2207-17. PubMed ID: 24796760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can the irrelevant speech effect turn into a stimulus suffix effect?
    Schlittmeier SJ; Hellbrück J; Klatte M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 18421641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech versus non-speech as irrelevant sound: controlling acoustic variation.
    Little JS; Martin FH; Thomson RH
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Sep; 85(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 20553792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials with the use of acoustic clicks and complex verbal sounds in young adults with learning disabilities.
    Kouni SN; Giannopoulos S; Ziavra N; Koutsojannis C
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2013; 34(6):646-51. PubMed ID: 23953938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task difficulty differentially affects two measures of processing load: the pupil response during sentence processing and delayed cued recall of the sentences.
    Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1156-65. PubMed ID: 23785182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory long latency responses to tonal and speech stimuli.
    Swink S; Stuart A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 55(2):447-59. PubMed ID: 22199192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. First things first: similar list length and output order effects for verbal and nonverbal stimuli.
    Cortis C; Dent K; Kennett S; Ward G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1179-214. PubMed ID: 25528092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seeing speech affects acoustic information processing in the human brainstem.
    Musacchia G; Sams M; Nicol T; Kraus N
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 16217645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Irrelevant speech effects and statistical learning.
    Neath I; Guérard K; Jalbert A; Bireta TJ; Surprenant AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1551-9. PubMed ID: 19370483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of modality in earwitness identification: memory for verbal and nonverbal auditory stimuli presented in two contexts.
    Huss MT; Weaver KA
    J Gen Psychol; 1996 Oct; 123(4):277-87. PubMed ID: 9042739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceiving identical sounds as speech or non-speech modulates activity in the left posterior superior temporal sulcus.
    Möttönen R; Calvert GA; Jääskeläinen IP; Matthews PM; Thesen T; Tuomainen J; Sams M
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(2):563-9. PubMed ID: 16275021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory imagery: empirical findings.
    Hubbard TL
    Psychol Bull; 2010 Mar; 136(2):302-29. PubMed ID: 20192565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic auditory localization by normal and learning disability children.
    Devens JS; Hoyer EA; McCroskey RL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(4):172-8. PubMed ID: 659289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sign and symbol in children's processing of familiar auditory stimuli.
    Lamberts F
    Am J Ment Defic; 1981 Nov; 86(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 6171166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of noise on identification and serial recall of nonsense syllables in older and younger adults.
    Surprenant AM
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2007 Mar; 14(2):126-43. PubMed ID: 17364376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How the listener integrates the components of speaking rate.
    Grosjean F; Lane H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Nov; 2(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 1011003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.