These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4463375)

  • 1. Motility of mice after amphetamine: effects of strain, aggregation and illumination.
    Davis WM; Babbini M; Pong SF; King WT; White CL
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1974; 2(6):803-9. PubMed ID: 4463375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Central effects of scopolamine and (+)-amphetamine on locomotor activity: interaction with strain and stress variables;
    Anisman H; Cygan D
    Neuropharmacology; 1975 Nov; 14(11):835-40. PubMed ID: 1207879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of scopolamine and d-amphetamine on locomotor activity before and after shock: a diallel analysis in mice.
    Anisman H
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1976 Jul; 48(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 826929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic and ontogenetic variations in locomotor activity following treatment with scopolamine or d-amphetamine.
    Remington G; Anisman H
    Dev Psychobiol; 1976 Nov; 9(6):579-85. PubMed ID: 1001843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of varying doses of d-amphetamine on activity levels of prepubertal mice.
    Cytryn AS
    Psychiatry Res; 1980 Sep; 3(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 6934556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of d-amphetamine and scopolamine on activity before and after shock in three mouse strains.
    Anisman H; Wahlsten D; Kokkinidis L
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1975; 3(5):819-24. PubMed ID: 1208622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic variations in midbrain dopamine cell number: parallel with differences in responses to dopaminergic agonists and in naturalistic behaviors mediated by central dopaminergic systems.
    Fink JS; Reis DJ
    Brain Res; 1981 Oct; 222(2):335-49. PubMed ID: 6116521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interstrain variation in acute toxic response to caffeine among inbred mice.
    Seale TW; Johnson P; Carney JM; Rennert OM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1984 Apr; 20(4):567-73. PubMed ID: 6728873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic analysis of the behavioral response to d-amphetamine in mice.
    Moisset B
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1977 Aug; 53(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 408855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interaction of delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol and d-amphetamine in aggregated mice.
    Craigmill AL; Canafax DM; Curtiss FR
    Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol; 1974 Oct; 9(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 4438830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A rapid automatic method for determining shock sensitivities of mice.
    Wolthuis OL; Kepner LA; Vanwersch RA
    Physiol Behav; 1973 Oct; 11(4):447-53. PubMed ID: 4743222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differentiation of response biases elicited by scopolamine and d-amphetamine: effects on habituation.
    Anisman H; Kokkinidis L; Glazier S; Remington G
    Behav Biol; 1976 Nov; 18(3):401-17. PubMed ID: 1016178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A genetic analysis of the hyperthermic response to d-amphetamine in two inbred strains of mice.
    Jori A; Rutczynski M
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1978 Oct; 59(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 103123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of d-amphetamine upon open field behaviour in two inbred strains of mice.
    Moisset B; Welch BL
    Experientia; 1973 May; 29(5):625-6. PubMed ID: 4730313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of control activity levels in the reported strain differences to the behavioral effects of drugs in mice.
    Wenger GR
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1989 Jan; 32(1):241-7. PubMed ID: 2734335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetics of nicotine response in four inbred strains of mice.
    Marks MJ; Burch JB; Collins AC
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1983 Jul; 226(1):291-302. PubMed ID: 6864548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of d- and l-amphetamine on dorsal and ventral hypothalamic self-stimulation in three inbred strains of mice.
    Cazala P
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1976 Nov; 5(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 1019180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strain differences in amphetamine sensitivity in mice. I. A diallel analysis of open field activity.
    Kitahama K; Valatx JL
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1979 Nov; 66(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 119262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic determinants of sensitivity to pentobarbital in inbred mice.
    Crabbe JC; Metten P; Gallaher EJ; Belknap JK
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Jun; 161(4):408-16. PubMed ID: 12073169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strain differences in lithium attenuation of d-amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion: a mouse model for the genetics of clinical response to lithium.
    Gould TD; O'Donnell KC; Picchini AM; Manji HK
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2007 Jun; 32(6):1321-33. PubMed ID: 17151598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.