BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 447107)

  • 1. Endoscopic retrograde brush cytology in patients with primary and secondary malignancies of the pancreas.
    Osnes M; Serck-Hanssen A; Kristensen O; Swensen T; Aune S; Myren J
    Gut; 1979 Apr; 20(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 447107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endoscopic retrograde brush cytology (ERBC) of the biliary and pancreatic ducts.
    Osnes M; Serck-Hanssen A; Myren J
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1975; 10(8):829-31. PubMed ID: 1202615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP.
    Macken E; Drijkoningen M; Van Aken E; Van Steenbergen W
    Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2000; 63(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 11189981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided brush cytology diagnosis of pancreatobiliary tumors].
    Gao L; Man XH; Cai YB; Zheng JM; Zhu MH
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 38(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 19575856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Usefulness of brush cytology combined with pancreatic juice cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: significance of pancreatic juice cytology after brushing.
    Yamaguchi T; Shirai Y; Nakamura N; Sudo K; Nakamura K; Hironaka S; Hara T; Denda T
    Pancreas; 2012 Nov; 41(8):1225-9. PubMed ID: 23086246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopic brush cytology from the biliary duct system is still valuable.
    Eiholm S; Thielsen P; Kromann-Andersen H
    Dan Med J; 2013 Jul; 60(7):A4656. PubMed ID: 23809967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictors for detection of cancer in patients with indeterminate biliary stricture and atypical cells on endoscopic retrograde brush cytology.
    Navaneethan U; Singh T; Gutierrez NG; Jegadeesan R; Venkatesh PG; Brainard J; Vargo JJ; Parsi MA
    J Dig Dis; 2014 May; 15(5):268-75. PubMed ID: 24612456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brush cytology for pancreatic carcinoma: an analysis of factors influencing results.
    McGuire DE; Venu RP; Brown RD; Etzkorn KP; Glaws WR; Abu-Hammour A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1996 Sep; 44(3):300-4. PubMed ID: 8885350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The safety and benefit of pancreatic juice cytology under ERCP in IPMN patients.
    Yoshioka T; Shigekawa M; Yamai T; Suda T; Kegasawa T; Iwahashi K; Ikezawa K; Sakamori R; Yakushijin T; Hiramatsu N; Tatsumi T; Takehara T
    Pancreatology; 2016; 16(6):1020-1027. PubMed ID: 27567445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective randomised study of dense Infinity cytological brush versus regularly used brush in pancreaticobiliary malignancy.
    Kylänpää L; Boyd S; Ristimäki A; Lindström O; Udd M; Halttunen J
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016; 51(5):590-3. PubMed ID: 26642244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic Yield of Serial Pancreatic Juice Aspiration Cytologic Examination With Brush Cytology for Pancreatic Ductal Stenosis.
    Mie T; Sasaki T; Takeda T; Okamoto T; Mori C; Furukawa T; Yamada Y; Kasuga A; Matsuyama M; Ozaka M; Sasahira N
    Pancreas; 2022 Sep; 51(8):995-999. PubMed ID: 36607945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures.
    Smoczynski M; Jablonska A; Matyskiel A; Lakomy J; Dubowik M; Marek I; Biernat W; Limon J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 22078103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography.
    Ihre T; Pyk E; Raaschou-Nielsen T; Seligson U
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1978; 13(6):657-62. PubMed ID: 694410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Classification of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy findings in pancreaticobiliary strictures.
    Meining A; Shah RJ; Slivka A; Pleskow D; Chuttani R; Stevens PD; Becker V; Chen YK
    Endoscopy; 2012 Mar; 44(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 22261749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided brushings in preoperative assessment of pancreaticobiliary strictures: what's new?
    Athanassiadou P; Grapsa D
    Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 18323272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brush cytology in the assessment of pancreatico-biliary strictures: a review of 406 cases.
    Stewart CJ; Mills PR; Carter R; O'Donohue J; Fullarton G; Imrie CW; Murray WR
    J Clin Pathol; 2001 Jun; 54(6):449-55. PubMed ID: 11376018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of endoscopic aspiration cytology and endoscopic retrograde cholangi-pancreatography (ERCP) in patients with cancer of the pancreas. Part I.
    Harada H; Sasaki T; Yamamoto N; Tanaka J; Tomiyama Y
    Gastroenterol Jpn; 1977; 12(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 863179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The usefulness of ERCP and the study of pancreatic duct biopsy and brush cytology on the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer].
    Yamada M; Tsukamoto S; Nakagawa H; Ishihara A; Hirooka Y; Naito Y; Mitake M; Yamao K
    Rinsho Byori; 1991 Jun; Suppl 89():86-99. PubMed ID: 1654467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for solid pancreatic neoplasms.
    Malak M; Masuda D; Ogura T; Imoto A; Abdelaal UM; Sabet EA; Abo Dahab LH; Higuchi K
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):360-7. PubMed ID: 26365063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in primary and secondary tumours of the pancreas.
    Swensen T; Osnes M; Serck-Hanssen A
    Br J Radiol; 1980 Aug; 53(632):760-4. PubMed ID: 7437685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.