These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 447303)
1. In vitro fertilization: legal and ethical implications. Horan DJ Hosp Prog; 1979 May; 60(5):60-5. PubMed ID: 447303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The promise and peril of stem cell research. Scientists confront thorny ethical issues. Couzin J US News World Rep; 1999 May; 126(21):68. PubMed ID: 10387893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro fertilization research funding seen "ethically acceptable". Castelli J Hosp Prog; 1979 Apr; 60(4):18, 20b. PubMed ID: 422168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro fertilization: a moratorium is in order. Diamond EF Hosp Prog; 1979 May; 60(5):66-8, 80. PubMed ID: 447304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Protection of human subjects; HEW support of human in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: report of the Ethics Advisory Board. Fed Regist; 1979 Jun; 44(118):35033-58. PubMed ID: 10242488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The stem cell debate: the legal, political and ethical issues surrounding federal funding of scientific research on human embryos. George EP Albany Law J Sci Technol; 2002; 12(2):747-803. PubMed ID: 15212013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Federally funding human embryonic stem cell research: an administrative analysis. Gross GS Wis L Rev; 2000; 4():855-84. PubMed ID: 12664903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Bioethical catch-22: the moratorium on federal funding of fetal tissue transplantation research and the NIH revitalization amendments. Maroney HM J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():485-519. PubMed ID: 10126947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A stalemate on test-tube baby research. Abramowitz S Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Feb; 14(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 6715155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The great cell debate. Goldstein A Time; 2001 Jul; 158(3):24-5. PubMed ID: 11484322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Specially respecting the living human embryo by adhering to standard human subject experimentation rules. Casey SB; Adams NA Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 2(1):109, 111-41. PubMed ID: 12664939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A false choice. Science should trump politics in the stem-cell debate. Borger G US News World Rep; 2001 Jul; 131(1):27. PubMed ID: 11447651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal experimentation: moral, legal, and medical implications. Reback GL Stanford Law Rev; 1974 May; 26(5):1191-207. PubMed ID: 11663472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Lengthening the stem: allowing federally funded researchers to derive human pluripotent stem cells from embryos. Casell JH Univ Mich J Law Reform; 2001; 34(3):547-72. PubMed ID: 16538744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal experimentation: legal implications of an ethical conundrum. Wilson JP Denver Law J; 1976; 53(4):581-642. PubMed ID: 11664590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethical and existential developments in contemporaneous American medicine: their implications for culture and society. Fox RC Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1974; 52(4):445-83. PubMed ID: 11663505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]