These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 447825)

  • 21. Influence of respiration on recordings of lower esophageal sphincter pressure in humans.
    Welch RW; Gray JE
    Gastroenterology; 1982 Sep; 83(3):590-4. PubMed ID: 7095363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Three-dimensional pressure profilometry of the anal sphincter.
    van der Hulst VP; Bemelman WA; Dijkhuis T; Klopper PJ
    Hepatogastroenterology; 1991 Dec; 38 Suppl 1():67-71. PubMed ID: 1823068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Esophageal contraction pressures are not affected by normal menstrual cycles.
    Nelson JL; Richter JE; Johns DN; Castell DO; Centola GM
    Gastroenterology; 1984 Oct; 87(4):867-71. PubMed ID: 6468874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Manometric vector volume analysis to assess lower esophageal sphincter function.
    Stein HJ; Korn O; Liebermann-Meffert D
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1995; 84(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 7574373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Esophageal manometry: a comparison of findings in younger and older patients.
    Ribeiro AC; Klingler PJ; Hinder RA; DeVault K
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 May; 93(5):706-10. PubMed ID: 9625113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Excessive competence of the lower oesophageal sphincter after Nissen fundoplication: evaluation by three-dimensional computerised imaging.
    Zaninotto G; Costantini M; Anselmino M; Boccù C; Bagolin F; Polo R; Ancona E
    Eur J Surg; 1995 Apr; 161(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 7612765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accurate placement of the esophageal pH electrode for 24-hour pH monitoring using a combined pH/manometry probe.
    Klingler PJ; Hinder RA; Wetscher GJ; Davis DM; Achem SR; Seelig MH; O'Brien P; DeVault KR
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Apr; 95(4):906-9. PubMed ID: 10763935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A method for continuous monitoring of upper esophageal sphincter pressure.
    Kahrilas PJ; Dent J; Dodds WJ; Hogan WJ; Arndorfer RC
    Dig Dis Sci; 1987 Feb; 32(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 3803142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Clinical study on responses of the upper esophageal sphincter after subtotal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
    Tokuhara T; Higashino M; Osugi H; Maekawa N; Tanimura S; Fukunaga Y; Kinoshita H
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Jun; 93(6):578-88. PubMed ID: 1630434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reproducibility of the rapid pull-through technique for categorizing lower esophageal sphincter pressure.
    Staiano A; Clouse RE
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1991 Sep; 86(9):1134-7. PubMed ID: 1882790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Deterioration of esophageal motility with age: a manometric study of 79 healthy subjects.
    Grande L; Lacima G; Ros E; Pera M; Ascaso C; Visa J; Pera C
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Jul; 94(7):1795-801. PubMed ID: 10406237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fundic pressure rise lowers lower esophageal sphincter pressure in man.
    Müller-Lissner SA; Blum AL
    Hepatogastroenterology; 1982 Aug; 29(4):151-2. PubMed ID: 7129339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of intravenous midazolam on esophageal motility testing in normal human volunteers.
    Marsh JK; Hoffman SM; Dmuchowski CF
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1993 Jun; 88(6):860-3. PubMed ID: 8503381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Manometric study of the pharynx and pharyngoesophageal sphincter in myasthenia gravis].
    Joshita Y; Yoshida M; Yoshida Y; Kimura K
    Rinsho Shinkeigaku; 1990 Sep; 30(9):944-51. PubMed ID: 2265503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and reflux: mechanistic analysis using concurrent fluoroscopy and high-resolution manometry.
    Pandolfino JE; Zhang QG; Ghosh SK; Han A; Boniquit C; Kahrilas PJ
    Gastroenterology; 2006 Dec; 131(6):1725-33. PubMed ID: 17087957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of age on differences in upper esophageal sphincter and pharynx pressures between patients with dysphagia and control subjects.
    Meier-Ewert HK; Van Herwaarden MA; Gideon RM; Castell JA; Achem S; Castell DO
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Jan; 96(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 11197284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Change in the force-summed pressure measurements of the upper esophageal sphincter prelaryngectomy and postlaryngectomy.
    Welch RW; Gates GA; Luckmann KF; Ricks PM; Drake ST
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1979; 88(Pt 1):804-8. PubMed ID: 517922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intraluminal oesophageal manometry. Influence of pressure probe diameter.
    Wallin L; Stanciu C; Madsen T; Boesby S
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1980; 15(7):865-8. PubMed ID: 7209395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The use of intraluminal manometry to assess upper esophageal sphincter function.
    Massey BT
    Dysphagia; 1993; 8(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 8269727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radial and longitudinal asymmetry of human pharyngeal pressures during swallowing.
    Sears VW; Castell JA; Castell DO
    Gastroenterology; 1991 Dec; 101(6):1559-63. PubMed ID: 1955121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.