These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 447911)

  • 1. Investigating the MESA (multipoint electrotactile speech aid): the transmission of connected discourse.
    Sparks DW; Ardell LA; Bourgeois M; Wiedmer B; Kuhl PK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Mar; 65(3):810-5. PubMed ID: 447911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating the MESA (multipoint electrotactile speech aid): the transmission of segmental features of speech.
    Sparks DW; Kuhl PK; Edmonds AE; Gray GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Jan; 63(1):246-57. PubMed ID: 632417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual and tactual perception of syllable number in sentence stimuli.
    Bourgeois MS; Goldstein H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jan; 73(1):367-71. PubMed ID: 6219145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech perception studies using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor, residual hearing, and lipreading.
    Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Whitford LA; Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2593-607. PubMed ID: 2526169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of two multichannel tactile aids for the hearing impaired.
    Weisenberger JM; Broadstone SM; Saunders FA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Nov; 86(5):1764-75. PubMed ID: 2808925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The transmission of prosodic information via an electrotactile speechreading aid.
    Grant KW; Ardell LA; Kuhl PK; Sparks DW
    Ear Hear; 1986 Oct; 7(5):328-35. PubMed ID: 2945747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multisensory narrative tracking by a profoundly deaf subject using an electrocutaneous vocoder and a vibrotactile aid.
    Lynch MP; Eilers RE; Oller DK; Urbano RC; Pero PJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 32(2):331-8. PubMed ID: 2739385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laboratory projects in tactile aids to lipreading.
    De Filippo CL
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(4):211-27. PubMed ID: 6468779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech-tracking performance in single-channel cochlear implant subjects.
    Robbins AM; Osberger MJ; Miyamoto RT; Kienle ML; Myres WA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Dec; 28(4):565-78. PubMed ID: 3841379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of sentences, words, and speech features by profoundly hearing-impaired children using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor.
    Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Sarant JZ; Alcántara JI; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1374-84. PubMed ID: 2146297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tactual display of consonant voicing as a supplement to lipreading.
    Yuan H; Reed CM; Durlach NI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1003-15. PubMed ID: 16158656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phonemic information transmitted by a multichannel electrotactile speech processor.
    Blamey PJ; Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Clark GM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Dec; 31(4):620-9. PubMed ID: 3230892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial, tactile presentation of voice fundamental frequency as a supplement to lipreading: results of extended training with a single subject.
    Boothroyd A; Hnath-Chisolm T
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1988; 25(3):51-6. PubMed ID: 2970543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantification of the effects of training the auditory-visual reception of connected speech.
    Danz AD; Binnie CA
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 6190695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of text complexity on connected discourse tracking rate.
    Hochberg I; Rosen S; Ball V
    Ear Hear; 1989 Jun; 10(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 2744257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech pattern hearing aids for the profoundly hearing impaired: speech perception and auditory abilities.
    Faulkner A; Ball V; Rosen S; Moore BC; Fourcin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2136-55. PubMed ID: 1597605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preliminary evaluation of a multichannel electrotactile speech processor.
    Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jun; 83(6):2328-38. PubMed ID: 2970485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.