These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4479673)

  • 21. Determining the standard of care.
    O'Connell BA
    Dent Hyg (Chic); 1988 Apr; 62(4):161, 166. PubMed ID: 3163618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Expert witness testimony: the ethics of being a medical expert witness.
    Andrew LB
    Emerg Med Clin North Am; 2006 Aug; 24(3):715-31. PubMed ID: 16877139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Editorial: The power of appellate courts.
    Mills DH
    J Leg Med (N Y); 1975 Apr; 3(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 1079231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gates v. Jensen: another precedent for glaucoma testing.
    Thal LS
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1981 Apr; 52(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 7252031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Expert testimony: a perspective from the trenches.
    Hawkins TS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 17411781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Medical expert opinion: performance, the appearance in court in cases of medical malpractice].
    García-Garduza I
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2011; 49(5):563-70. PubMed ID: 22185861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Malpractice against psychologist, pediatrician and neurologist--dystonia musculorum deformans--direct and cross-examination of defendant's expert (a neurosurgeon)--part II.
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1977; 24(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 600061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The expert witness: understanding the rationale.
    Brenner RJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Sep; 4(9):612-6. PubMed ID: 17845966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Physician surveys to assess customary care in medical malpractice cases.
    Hartz A; Lucas J; Cramm T; Green M; Bentler S; Ely J; Wolfe S; James P
    J Gen Intern Med; 2002 Jul; 17(7):546-55. PubMed ID: 12133145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Medical tort falls short in court.
    Jones JW; McCullough LB
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Dec; 46(6):1303-5. PubMed ID: 18155010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Metamorphosis of the standard of care and physician experts.
    Foehl A
    Cost Qual Q J; 1997 Dec; 3(4):23-6. PubMed ID: 10176223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An inside look at malpractice by expert witness William B. Buckingham MD.. Interview by Karen Gardner.
    Buckingham WB
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1982 Jan; 8(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 6803209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Expert testimony based on decision analysis: a malpractice case report.
    Weir SS; Curtis P; McNutt RA
    J Gen Intern Med; 1990; 5(5):406-9. PubMed ID: 2231036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Court abandoned precedent & allowed nurse testimony. Freed v. Gisenger Medical Center, 77MAP 2007 (9/28/2010) A.2d -pA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Nov; 51(6):2. PubMed ID: 21158264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Amended judgment of malpractice due to delayed expert testimony. Decision by the German Federal Court 22 November 2005].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2006 Jun; 131(23):1339-40. PubMed ID: 16761205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The medical malpractice insurance crisis, again.
    Hoffman DN
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(2):15-9. PubMed ID: 15957313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Court recognizes medical expert testimony of nonphysician professional person.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1983 May; 64(5):68, 70. PubMed ID: 10324256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. US Supreme Court decisions, expert testimony, and implant dentistry.
    Flanagan D
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 12498453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On expert testimony. The Supreme Court of the Federal Republic of Germany (September 27, 1977).
    Deutsch E
    Med Law; 1983; 2(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 6687086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mammography malpractice litigation and the impact of MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act).
    Whiteman T
    Adm Radiol; 1995 Mar; 14(3):29-31. PubMed ID: 10142158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.