131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4488335)
1. Research in nursing; the federal interest and grant program.
Gortner SR
Am J Nurs; 1973 Jun; 73(6):1052-5. PubMed ID: 4488335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Federal grant support of optometric research and education.
Watzman N
Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom; 1971 Apr; 48(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 5279856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Nursing research grant proposals: what influenced their approval or disapproval in two national granting agencies.
Berthold JS
Nurs Res; 1973; 22(4):292-9. PubMed ID: 4489646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients.
Dove A
Nat Med; 2006 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 16397535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers.
Shalev M
Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Mar; 33(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 15235618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Confidentiality of research grant protocols.
Morgan TE; Keyes JA; Sherman JF
Clin Res; 1976 Jan; 24(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 10277868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Block grant opposed for NIH clinical centre.
Wadman M
Nature; 1996 Apr; 380(6576):658. PubMed ID: 8614446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. National Institutes of Health implements electronic grant submission.
J Investig Med; 2007 Jan; 55(1):9. PubMed ID: 17443943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The federal interest in nursing research. A summary of the research programs of the Division of Nursing, Bureau of Health Manpower Education; the National Institutes of Health, and the Health Services and Mental Health Administration.
Gortner SR
Nurs Res Conf; 1973; (9):419-24. PubMed ID: 4378072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. National Institutes of Health. Two strikes and you're out, grant applicants learn.
Kaiser J
Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5900):358. PubMed ID: 18927363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Declines in NIH R01 research grant funding.
Mandel HG; Vesell ES
Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):189. PubMed ID: 18845728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Grant proposal reviewer says he would have scored proposal lower due to conflict of interest.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2004 Dec; 19(12):8. PubMed ID: 15810180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. What do Public Health Service agencies do with grant proposals?
Willette RE
Am J Pharm Educ; 1977 Nov; 41(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 10313840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Without more federal support, success of U.S. stem cell research questioned.
Schmidt C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Feb; 97(3):164-5. PubMed ID: 15687355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A Nobel lesson: the grant behind the prize.
Berg JM
Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):900-1. PubMed ID: 18276870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. U.S. science funding. Research catches a break in catch-all spending bill.
Mervis J; Lawler A; Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Dec; 302(5651):1636-7. PubMed ID: 14657461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. What does a study section look for in evaluating a grant proposal?
Buckley JP
Am J Pharm Educ; 1977 Nov; 41(4):381-2. PubMed ID: 10236661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. National Cancer Institute support for scientific conferences.
Kalberer JT; Morrison BH
Cancer Res; 1980 Jul; 40(7):2617-22. PubMed ID: 6893013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Nobel lesson: the grant behind the prize. Response.
Capecchi MR
Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):900-1. PubMed ID: 18283726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A shot in the arm for clinical research.
Wadman M
Nature; 1996 Mar; 380(6571):187. PubMed ID: 8637558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
