98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4494755)
1. Education by example?
Merriman RJ
Occup Health (Lond); 1974 May; 26(5):182-3. PubMed ID: 4494755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Medical prevention of deafness due to noise].
Montandon A; Meier D
Z Unfallmed Berufskr; 1971; 64(3):206-15. PubMed ID: 5146391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Pitfalls encountered in the evaluation and medical prevention of professional deafness. (Experiences in Vaudoise plants)].
Lob M
Z Unfallmed Berufskr; 1971; 64(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 5146392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Is it possible to correlate preliminary marginal noise audiometry for the prevention of hearing loss due to detonation and noise with the results of present-day mass screenings?].
Pfander F
HNO; 1972 Feb; 20(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 5019163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Industrial noise: evaluation of its danger and individual protection].
Wisner A
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1971; 25(1):155-67. PubMed ID: 5120980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sound master noise attenuator.
Schiff M; Riedman R
Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1971; 75(2):404-7. PubMed ID: 5092566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of long term use of hearing protectors in industrial noise.
Nilsson R; Lindgren F
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):204-11. PubMed ID: 6939090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The otolaryngologist and hearing protectors.
Alberti PW; Riko K
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1984 Nov; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 6514358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparative studies of the damming effect and the wearing properties of hearing protective devices at the place of work].
Schulz G; Rublack K; Meister A; Dybowski S; Dubrau KH; Gretzschel D
Z Gesamte Hyg; 1983 Feb; 29(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 6858266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinico-physiologic assessment of the efficacity of certain types of modern antinoise ear caps].
Shalashov NIa
Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1970 May; 14(5):46-7. PubMed ID: 5428367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Proposals for evaluation of noise-injured persons for an expert opinion on hardness of hearing].
Vollbrecht E; Zenk H
Dtsch Gesundheitsw; 1971 Jan; 26(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 5095595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Technical prevention of noise].
Lütolf KF
Z Unfallmed Berufskr; 1971; 64(3):192-205. PubMed ID: 5146390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Audiometric adjustment of protective hearing devices].
von Arentsschild O; Güldenpfennig J; Mittag G; Fischer R
Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1971; 199(2):553-7. PubMed ID: 5153167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Effect of hearing protectors on speech comprehensibility].
Novotný Z
Cesk Otolaryngol; 1969 Dec; 18(6):260-4. PubMed ID: 5362560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Use of the temporary shift of the auditory threshold in the evaluation of the efficiency of an ear protector from a specific industrial noise].
Merluzzi F; Ferrari O
Med Lav; 1969 May; 60(5):366-74. PubMed ID: 5405685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Working in noise; in a program for the protection of hearing faculties, a judicious distribution of periods of nonexposure to noise is necessary].
Martinet P
Arch Mal Prof; 1972 Jun; 33(6):285-92. PubMed ID: 5079835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Program of hearing preservation in the metallurgy plant in Huachipato].
Benavides R
Rev Med Chil; 1973 Aug; 101(8):661-5. PubMed ID: 4775618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Industrial physician and hearing surveillance].
Meyer H
HNO; 1971 Nov; 19(11):346-50. PubMed ID: 5138275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The challenge of hearing protection.
Maas R
IMS Ind Med Surg; 1970 Mar; 39(3):124-8. PubMed ID: 5265722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [An effective means of protection of the auditory function from noises].
Tricković KS
Lav Um; 1973 Mar; 25(2):51-5. PubMed ID: 4744551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
