BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 449509)

  • 1. Improved case finding for pediatric hearing loss: cost analysis of school screening programs.
    Jacobs EE; Lavelle WG
    Laryngoscope; 1979 May; 89(5 Pt 1):693-7. PubMed ID: 449509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How accurate are bedside hearing tests?
    Boatman DF; Miglioretti DL; Eberwein C; Alidoost M; Reich SG
    Neurology; 2007 Apr; 68(16):1311-4. PubMed ID: 17438223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Auditory screening in public schools in Bilbao].
    Martínez Ibargüen A; Goiria Ormazábal JI; Orduna Zubiri J; Mateos García A; López Martínez I; Bustamante López BM; Magra Sáenz de Buruaga G; Domínguez Frejo B
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1993; 44(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 8334012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Remote hearing screenings via telehealth in a rural elementary school.
    Lancaster P; Krumm M; Ribera J; Klich R
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Dec; 17(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18840705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Further examination of infants referred from newborn hearing screening.
    Wada T; Kubo T; Aiba T; Yamane H
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2004 Oct; (554):17-25. PubMed ID: 15513505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [About the BOEL test].
    Faber E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Oct; 166(41):3624; author reply 3624. PubMed ID: 15515473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity of pure-tone hearing screening at well-child visits.
    Halloran DR; Hardin JM; Wall TC
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2009 Feb; 163(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 19188648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The BOEL test--false confidence].
    Ravn SH; Bjerager MO
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Aug; 166(36):3086-8. PubMed ID: 15387306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An analysis of the costs of implementing the National Newborn Hearing Screening Programme in England.
    Uus K; Bamford J; Taylor R
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 16569300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness and test-performance factors in relation to universal newborn hearing screening.
    Gorga MP; Neely ST
    Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev; 2003; 9(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 12784228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of costs and referral rates of 3 universal newborn hearing screening protocols.
    Vohr BR; Oh W; Stewart EJ; Bentkover JD; Gabbard S; Lemons J; Papile LA; Pye R
    J Pediatr; 2001 Aug; 139(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 11487750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A sound method for testing children's hearing.
    DiChiara E
    Am J Nurs; 1984 Sep; 84(9):1104-6. PubMed ID: 6566505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of audiometric screening criteria for the identification of noise-induced hearing loss in adolescents.
    Meinke DK; Dice N
    Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):S190-202. PubMed ID: 18056872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preschool hearing screening: pass/refer rates for children enrolled in a head start program in eastern North Carolina.
    Allen RL; Stuart A; Everett D; Elangovan S
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 15248802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Newborn hearing screening programs: overview.
    Hyde ML
    J Otolaryngol; 2005 Aug; 34 Suppl 2():S70-8. PubMed ID: 16076420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictors of hearing loss in school entrants in a developing country.
    Olusanya BO; Okolo AA; Aderemi AA
    J Postgrad Med; 2004; 50(3):173-8; discussion 178-9. PubMed ID: 15377800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Realization of International Healthy Hearing Program in Poland--hearing evaluation in participants of Special Olympics.
    Starska K; Lukomski M
    Adv Med Sci; 2006; 51():197-9. PubMed ID: 17357308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical accuracy of tuning fork tests.
    Stankiewicz JA; Mowry HJ
    Laryngoscope; 1979 Dec; 89(12):1956-63. PubMed ID: 513917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response.
    Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Ho GM; Fu TY; Bruna S; Lin G
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):1957-62. PubMed ID: 16319605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Screening for hearing disorders in school children of Medellin, Colombia, 1993].
    Rodríguez MA; Melguizo-Yepez M
    Salud Publica Mex; 1994; 36(6):670-2. PubMed ID: 7892643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.