These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 449988)

  • 1. Massachusetts Determination of Need Program.
    Shepard DS
    N Engl J Med; 1979 Jul; 301(4):219. PubMed ID: 449988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Massachusetts Determination of Need Program.
    Frechette AL
    N Engl J Med; 1979 Jul; 301(4):218-9. PubMed ID: 449986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Massachusetts Determination of Need Program.
    Damsgaard A
    N Engl J Med; 1979 Jul; 301(4):219. PubMed ID: 449987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A critique of the Massachusetts determination of need program.
    Sullivan PR; Damsgaard A; Rodkey GV
    N Engl J Med; 1979 Apr; 300(14):794-5. PubMed ID: 106276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Delays in California CON process add $25 million to costs.
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1980; 13(5-6):44-5. PubMed ID: 10248499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Federal district court upholds Medicare reimbursement of state-imposed certificate of need costs.
    Green MJ
    Health Law Vigil; 1982 Jun; 5(12):7-8. PubMed ID: 10298557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Capital offense. New York's health care in the crunch.
    McCarthy D
    Health PAC Bull; 1983; 14(4):5-15. PubMed ID: 10263870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Certificate of need: a failed instrument.
    Thompson AJ
    Internist; 1981 Feb; 22(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 10251076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First certificate of need inventory released.
    Health Plann Manpow Rep; 1983 May; 12(9):5-6. PubMed ID: 10261568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of certificate of need.
    Mathews CL
    J Miss State Med Assoc; 1980 Dec; 21(12):268-72. PubMed ID: 6777497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The high cost of a CON.
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1980 Aug; 13(4):12. PubMed ID: 10247904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Competition and CON: an incompatible combination?
    Bromberg MD
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1980 Aug; 13(4):5. PubMed ID: 10247913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Certificate-of-need--no panacea but not without merit.
    Tierney JT; Waters WJ; Rosenberg WH
    J Public Health Policy; 1982 Jun; 3(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 6179967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A follow-up analysis: Texas Health Facilities Commission application costs.
    Roark CE
    Tex Hosp; 1979 May; 34(12):36-8. PubMed ID: 10242391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Congressman Gramm favors eventual abolishment of CON to pave way for competition model.
    Gramm P
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1980 Aug; 13(4):20-1. PubMed ID: 10247905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost strategies for filing CONs.
    Heym RH
    Contemp Longterm Care; 1990 Jan; 13(1):40-2, 46, 82. PubMed ID: 10106311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The CON game: high costs just what intended.
    Payton S; Powsner RM
    Mich Med; 1981 Jul; 80(20):386, 382. PubMed ID: 6894962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health planning amendments will add to hospitals' certificate-of-need burdens.
    Saphier MD
    Hosp Forum; 1980; 23(3):47-8. PubMed ID: 10246234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Could two-level process eliminate costly planning problems?
    Tusler W
    Hospitals; 1979 Feb; 53(4):85-90. PubMed ID: 103798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hospital scanners need state okay in Massachusetts.
    Hospitals; 1979 Feb; 53(3):17-8. PubMed ID: 759297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.