These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4504302)

  • 1. The strength of class II amalgam restorations with and without pins.
    Mondelli J; Vieira DF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1972 Aug; 28(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 4504302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of three types of pins on compressive strength of dental amalgam.
    Duperon DF; Kasloff Z
    J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1971 Nov; 37(11):422-8. PubMed ID: 5288885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Silver pins: their influence on the strength and adaptation of amalgam.
    Moffa JP; Going RE; Gettleman L
    J Prosthet Dent; 1972 Nov; 28(5):491-9. PubMed ID: 4507571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture strength of Class II amalgam restorations condensed over protective bases.
    Vieira DF; Mondelli J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1973 Aug; 30(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 4515671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture strength of amalgam restorations in modern Class II preparations with proximal retentive grooves.
    Mondelli J; Ishikiriama A; de Lima Navarro MF; Galan J Junior ; coradazzi JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1974 Nov; 32(5):564-71. PubMed ID: 4531487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rationale for pin-retained amalgam restorations.
    Collard EW; Caputo AA; Standlee JP
    Dent Clin North Am; 1970 Jan; 14(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 5262043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of impact loading upon Class II amalgam restoration.
    Johnson BE
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1972; 39(3):206-14. PubMed ID: 4553905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of three types of pins on the tensile strength of dental amalgam.
    Duperon DF; Kasloff Z
    J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1973 Feb; 39(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 4510580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pin vs. slot retention in extensive amalgam restorations.
    Outhwaite WC; Garman TA; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Apr; 41(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 284120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Plastic deformation of the amalgam restoration as related to cavity design and alloy system.
    Galan J; Phillips RW; Swartz ML
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1973 Dec; 87(7):1395-400. PubMed ID: 4518562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of gold plating of stainless steel pins on the tensile strength of dental amalgam.
    Bapna MS; Lugassy AA
    J Dent Res; 1971; 50(4):846-9. PubMed ID: 5283242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro resistance of extensive amalgam restorations using various retention methods.
    Plasmans PJ; Kusters ST; de Jonge BA; van 't Hof MA; Vrijhoef MM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Jan; 57(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 3468247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of cement bases on the stresses in amalgam restorations.
    Farah JW; Hood JA; Craig RG
    J Dent Res; 1975; 54(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 1053748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of pins for retaining amalgam restorations: a synopsis.
    Watson PA; Gilmore HW
    J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1970 Jan; 36(1):30-1. PubMed ID: 5262875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Slots vs pins: a comparison of retention under simulated chewing stresses.
    Outhwaite WC; Twiggs SW; Fairhurst CW; King GE
    J Dent Res; 1982 Feb; 61(2):400-2. PubMed ID: 6948858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review of the amalgapin technique for complex amalgam restorations.
    Eberting JJ
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 11199563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Fracture strength of Class II amalgam restorations (author's transl)].
    Coradazzi JL; Mondelli J
    Estomatol Cult; 1972; 6(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 4525849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Optimized pin geometry for improved retention of parapulpal pins in amalgam].
    Neumeyer S; Gernet W; Bötsch H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Aug; 46(8):550-2. PubMed ID: 1817928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal fracture of amalgam restorations. A review.
    Bryant RW
    Aust Dent J; 1981 Aug; 26(4):222-4. PubMed ID: 7030285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of zinc-containing and zinc-free amalgam restorations.
    Watson PA; Philips RW; Swartz ML; Gilmore HW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1973 May; 29(5):536-41. PubMed ID: 4513306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.