These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Microleakage of several pin-retaining devices. Hembree JH Gen Dent; 1982; 30(5):429-31. PubMed ID: 6759302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of three cavity base materials under amalgam restorations. Gourley JM; Rose DE J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1972 Nov; 38(11):406-10. PubMed ID: 4508947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Influence of depth of the cavity preparation on the marginal infiltration of radioisotope (NaI-131) in dental restoration with silicate cement, zinc phosphate cement and chemically activated acrylic resin]. Komatsu J Rev Bras Odontol; 1971; 28(171):213-20. PubMed ID: 5292082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Histological reactions of the dental pulp of the dog to fillings made of Palakav]. Viohl J Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1970; 25(3):379-89. PubMed ID: 5264677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Bases and liners: current concepts. Weiner R J Mass Dent Soc; 1999; 48(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 10740524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Effect of cavity liners in adhesive fillings]. Schwickerath H; Nolden R Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1982 Apr; 37(4):336-8. PubMed ID: 7047142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Experimental studies on the marginal seal of materials used as insulation linings]. Wasik A Czas Stomatol; 1975 Jun; 28(6):601-8. PubMed ID: 1055667 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Finishing studies of cast fillings in relation to the material, the instrument, the clearance width and the lining of the cavity margin]. Jahn KR; Nack W; Zuhrt R Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1985; 73(3):262-74. PubMed ID: 3161251 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material. Lindquist TJ; Connolly J J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Thermal diffusivity of bases and restorative dental materials]. Muench A Rev Fac Odontol Sao Paulo; 1974; 12(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 4536129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity of teeth with and without cement bases under amalgam restorations: a clinical study. Miller BC; Charbeneau GT Oper Dent; 1984; 9(4):130-5. PubMed ID: 6596554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparative evaluation of the electric resistance of various materials used for dental cavity lining]. Malzone A; Loffredo A; Mariani P; Petrone F Arch Stomatol (Napoli); 1983; 24(4):577-88. PubMed ID: 6599250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative biological test of polyacrylate and phosphate cement in monolayer cultures]. Welker D; Neupert G Stomatol DDR; 1974 Sep; 24(9):602-10. PubMed ID: 4610911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Biological properties of materials in conservative dentistry. II. Materials for cavity lining and cementation]. Deli R; Miani C Minerva Stomatol; 1983; 32(6):883-90. PubMed ID: 6583487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical experience in application and value of some cavity filling materials]. Jović M; Milojković B; Popović M; Pavlović P; Kocić Z Stomatol Vjesn; 1968; 2(1-6):243-7. PubMed ID: 5293746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]