These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4507223)

  • 21. [Bond strength of refrained analgam].
    Jorgensen KD; Saito T
    Tandlaegebladet; 1968 Jun; 72(6):498-507. PubMed ID: 5247165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Observations on a composite resin for Class II restorations: three-year report.
    Phillips RW; Avery DR; Mehra R; Swartz ML; McCune RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1973 Dec; 30(6):891-7. PubMed ID: 4519428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of compaction technic and mercury: alloy ratio on the adaptation of spherical alloy dental amalgam.
    Azar ES; Gardner KD; Hodson JT; Stibbs GD
    J Dent Res; 1969; 48(5):879-82. PubMed ID: 5261300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of trituration on dimensional changes of dental amalgam.
    Espevik S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1977; 35(5):251-5. PubMed ID: 270274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Comparative study of marginal infiltration of radioisotope in spherical and conventional amalgam fillings].
    Holland Junior C; Komatsu J; Russo M
    Rev Fac Odontol Aracatuba; 1975; 4(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 1075596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical comparison of composite, amalgam, and silicate restorations.
    Eames WB; Strain JD; Weitman RT; Williams AK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1974 Nov; 89(5):1111-7. PubMed ID: 4529964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A two-, three-, and four-year follow-up of a clinical study of the effect of trituration on amalgam restorations.
    Osborne JW; Gale EN
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1974 Apr; 88(4):795-7. PubMed ID: 4521770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of acid-treated Ag3Sn on the tensile strength and fracture of dental amalgam.
    Young FA; Wilsdorf HG
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1968 Sep; 2(3):401-3. PubMed ID: 5708020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of the dentist upon dimensional change and creep of amalgam.
    Spanauf AJ; Vrijhoef MM; Graaf RD
    Aust Dent J; 1977 Oct; 22(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 277153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A 30-month clinical evaluation of the influence of finishing and size of restoration on the margin performance of five amalgam alloys.
    Birtcil RF; Pelzner RB; Stark MM
    J Dent Res; 1981 Dec; 60(12):1949-56. PubMed ID: 7028822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparative study on the effect of various polishing materials on the surface of amalgam restorations.
    Zaazou AM; Hassanein el-S ; Nasr Y; Bakry S
    Egypt Dent J; 1976 Oct; 22(4):79-90. PubMed ID: 1071988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Characteristics and handling of Cu-rich amalgam.
    Marker BC; Marshall GW
    Quintessence Int Dent Dig; 1979 Oct; 10(10):125-32. PubMed ID: 298774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Marginal fracture of amalgam restorations.
    Mahler DB; Terkla LG; Van Eysden J
    J Dent Res; 1973; 52(4):823-7. PubMed ID: 4515865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Proposals for the improvement of the quality of dental amalgam restorations].
    Schneider H; Popa S
    Stomatologia (Bucur); 1973; 20(6):511-6. PubMed ID: 4520673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Studies on the dimensional change of dental amalgams--with reference to the dimensional change of spherical amalgam developed in Japan.
    Nagai K; Ohashi M
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1967 Apr; 9(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 5235383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Long term follow-up of clinical evaluations of lathe-cute versus spherical amalgam.
    Osborne JW; Gale EN
    J Dent Res; 1974; 53(5):1204-7. PubMed ID: 4528925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Porosity of spherical amalgam.
    Hegdahl T; Silness J
    Scand J Dent Res; 1970; 78(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 5274216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Distribution of porosity in spherical amalgam.
    Silness J; Hegdahl T
    Scand J Dent Res; 1970; 78(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 5274217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The life span of amalgam restorations].
    Letzel H
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1992 Aug; 99(8):296-7. PubMed ID: 11915771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Three-year clinical comparison of three amalgam alloy types emphasizing an appraisal of the evaluation methods used.
    Osborne JW; Phillips RW; Gale EN; Binon PP
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1976 Oct; 93(4):784-9. PubMed ID: 1067342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.