These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4507223)

  • 41. The clinical evaluation of amalgam alloys.
    Jacobsen PH
    Br Dent J; 1984 Dec; 157(12):436-9. PubMed ID: 6397217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Plastic deformation of the amalgam restoration as related to cavity design and alloy system.
    Galan J; Phillips RW; Swartz ML
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1973 Dec; 87(7):1395-400. PubMed ID: 4518562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The clinical comparison of a spherical amalgam alloy and a conventional amalgam alloy: a pilot study.
    Mathewson RJ; Bruner FW; Noonan RG
    J Dent Child; 1967 May; 34(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 5338512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Quality control of amalgam restorations. II. A comparison of 4 non-clinical review methods].
    Borgmeyer PJ; Advocaat JG; Akerboom HB
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1982 Oct; 89(10):397-404. PubMed ID: 6960261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Lining materials for amalgam restorations.
    Lim MY; McCabe JF
    Br Dent J; 1982 May; 152(9):313-5. PubMed ID: 6952909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of impact loading upon Class II amalgam restoration.
    Johnson BE
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1972; 39(3):206-14. PubMed ID: 4553905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Hardness tests of dental amalgam restorations].
    Schultz BA
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1973 May; 80(5):167-74. PubMed ID: 4513724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Can amalgam obturations be improved?].
    Vermeersch AG
    Rev Belge Med Dent; 1978; 33(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 284520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of rheological properties of four dental restorative materials.
    Torgalkar AM
    J Dent Res; 1973; 52(3):476-82. PubMed ID: 4521640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Studies on the relationship between the conditions of spherical alloy amalgam specimen making and its physical properties (author's transl)].
    Nakamura E
    Nihon Shika Zairyo Kikai Gakkai Zasshi; 1974 Dec; 31(4):297-315. PubMed ID: 4535007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The strength of dental amalgam as influenced by pins.
    Going RE; Moffa JP; Nostrant GW; Johnson BE
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1968 Dec; 77(6):1331-4. PubMed ID: 5246636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. An in-vitro investigation of variables influencing mercury vapor release from dental amalgam.
    Neme AL; Maxson BB; Linger JB; Abbott LJ
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 11817472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A comparison of in vivo and in vitro microleakage of dental restorations.
    McCurdy CR; Swartz ML; Phillips RW; Rhodes BF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1974 Mar; 88(3):592-602. PubMed ID: 4204384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Correlations between the microstructure and the "creep" of amalgams].
    Vrijhoef MM; Scharschmidt J; Rehberg HJ
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1975 Sep; 30(9):602-5. PubMed ID: 1060552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of three types of pins on compressive strength of dental amalgam.
    Duperon DF; Kasloff Z
    J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1971 Nov; 37(11):422-8. PubMed ID: 5288885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Standardizing evaluations of the clinical marginal fracture of amalgam.
    Mahler DB; Engle JH; Bryant RW
    J Dent Res; 1986 Aug; 65(8):1108-11. PubMed ID: 3461027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Physical properties of lathe-cut and spherical amalgams.
    Greasley A; Baker DL
    Br Dent J; 1978 May; 144(10):303-11. PubMed ID: 274961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Comparative study of amalgam fillings by vibrator application].
    Kövágó A; Kemenes I; Molnár I
    Fogorv Sz; 1974 Nov; 67(11):335-9. PubMed ID: 4529741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Fracture strength of amalgam restorations in modern Class II preparations with proximal retentive grooves.
    Mondelli J; Ishikiriama A; de Lima Navarro MF; Galan J Junior ; coradazzi JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1974 Nov; 32(5):564-71. PubMed ID: 4531487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Manual or mechanical condensation of amalgam?].
    Albini Riccioli G
    Mondo Odontostomatol; 1970-1971; 13(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 5281181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.