These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4514413)

  • 1. Conformity of audiometric systems with federal noise regulations.
    Preslar MJ
    N C Med J; 1973 Jun; 34(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 4514413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technical state of audiometers in hearing conservation programmes - Can we determine hearing threshold correctly?
    Pfeiffer BH
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):283-91. PubMed ID: 6939099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
    Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A practical approach to noise measurement.
    Coleman SR
    Occup Health Saf; 1983 Jul; 52(7):47-51. PubMed ID: 6621963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of circumaural earphones in audiometry. Report No. 450.
    Harris JD
    Rep US Nav Submar Med Cent; 1968 Jul; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 5305447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. American National Standard specifications for audiometers.
    Melnick W
    ASHA; 1971 Apr; 13(4):203-6. PubMed ID: 5550370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Biological significance of the changes in the auditory threshold induced by variability of environmental noise].
    Cadariu G; Ionescu A
    Fiziol Norm Patol; 1973; 19(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 4753773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of ambient acoustic noise on the auditory steady-state response thresholds in normally hearing adults.
    Kei J; Smith D; Joseph S; Stopa J; Kang S; Darnell R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17715465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calibration and working condition of 100 audiometers.
    Thomas WG; Preslar MJ; Summers RR; Stewart JL
    Public Health Rep (1896); 1969 Apr; 84(4):311-27. PubMed ID: 4976250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audiometric instrumentation: equipment choices, techniques.
    Morrill JC
    Occup Health Saf; 1984; 53(10):78-84. PubMed ID: 6549600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bekesy audiometry: threshold recruitment and rhythm factors.
    Reger SN
    Laryngoscope; 1971 Nov; 81(11):1802-9. PubMed ID: 5117719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guidelines for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry.
    ASHA; 1978 Apr; 20(4):297-301. PubMed ID: 656172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ambient noise levels in mobile audiometric testing facilities: compliance with industry standards.
    Lankford JE; Perrone DC; Thunder TD
    AAOHN J; 1999 Apr; 47(4):163-7. PubMed ID: 10418346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Temporary shift in the auditory threshold of lumberjacks working with mechanized saws].
    Nowacka E
    Med Pr; 1981; 32(6):429-32. PubMed ID: 7341909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Threshold audiometric studies on hearing disorders in starfighter ground personnel].
    Grosskurth D
    Med Welt; 1972 May; 23(22):818-20. PubMed ID: 5045316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ambient noise levels in audiometric test rooms used for clinical audiometry.
    Frank T; Williams DL
    Ear Hear; 1993 Dec; 14(6):414-22. PubMed ID: 8307246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noise: the government's view.
    Train RE
    Med Times; 1974 Mar; 102(3):63-4. PubMed ID: 4815425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Behavior of 8000 Hz audiometric threshold in chronic acoustic trauma].
    Albera R; Milan F; Ferreri A; Beatrice F; Bosia S; Romano C
    Med Lav; 1994; 85(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 7808347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Problem of rational audiometry and the principle of rationality in audiometric studies].
    Lopotko AI
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1971; 34(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 5154286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comfortable loudness judgments for discrete frequency signals.
    Berger KW; Harrison LD; Monack N; Ferren GE
    J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 7345058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.