These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Dental and skeletal relationships to attritional occlusion. Fishman LS Angle Orthod; 1976 Jan; 46(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 766672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. Chang HP Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Aug; 92(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 3475966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Skeletal classification of maxillary and mandibular malpositions. Jefferson Y Funct Orthod; 1996; 13(5):21-4. PubMed ID: 9569780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Maxillary and mandibular dentoalveolar heights of French-Canadians 10 to 15 years of age. Buschang PH; Carrillo R; Liu SS; Demirjian A Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 18193960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Spacing in deciduous dentition of Polish children in relation to tooth size and dental arch dimensions. Janiszewska-Olszowska J; Stepien P; Syrynska M Arch Oral Biol; 2009 May; 54(5):397-402. PubMed ID: 19251244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A cephalometric comparison between class II, division 2 malocclusion and normal occlusion. Godiawala RN; Joshi MR Angle Orthod; 1974 Jul; 44(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 4527603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Longitudinal dental arch changes in the mixed dentition. Slaj M; Jezina MA; Lauc T; Rajić-Mestrović S; Miksić M Angle Orthod; 2003 Oct; 73(5):509-14. PubMed ID: 14580017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of overjet among 3 arch types in normal occlusion. Kim BI; Bayome M; Kim Y; Baek SH; Han SH; Kim SH; Kook YA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):e253-60. PubMed ID: 21392669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Treatment effects and short-term relapse of maxillomandibular expansion during the early to mid mixed dentition. Vargo J; Buschang PH; Boley JC; English JD; Behrents RG; Owen AH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):456-63. PubMed ID: 17418711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Criteria used to establish the ideal plane of occlusion. Part II. Carlson J Funct Orthod; 1996; 13(4):21-8, 30. PubMed ID: 9566156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical applicability of variations in arch dimensions and arch forms among various vertical facial patterns. Anwar N; Fida M J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2011 Nov; 21(11):685-90. PubMed ID: 22078349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [The limits of the mandibular dentition]. Marché-Seyrat M Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1985 Apr; 19(2):151-64. PubMed ID: 3865322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of dental arch dimensions in children from southern and northern Finland. Huggare J; Lahtela P; Viljamaa P; Nyström M; Peck L Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1993; 89(3-4):95-100. PubMed ID: 8134333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Associations in width dimensions of the upper and lower jaws. Slavgsvold O Trans Eur Orthod Soc; 1971; ():465-71. PubMed ID: 5293106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Which hard and soft tissue factors relate with the amount of buccal corridor space during smiling? Yang IH; Nahm DS; Baek SH Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 18193972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Three-dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models. El-Zanaty HM; El-Beialy AR; Abou El-Ezz AM; Attia KH; El-Bialy AR; Mostafa YA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 20152684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]