These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4519554)

  • 1. A follow-up study of post- or pinretained amalgam fillings with special reference to possible corrosion.
    Simonsen TL; Nilsen GN; Hals E
    Scand J Dent Res; 1973; 81(6):415-24. PubMed ID: 4519554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recall evaluation of iatrogenic root perforations repaired with amalgam and gutta-percha.
    Benenati FW; Roane JB; Biggs JT; Simon JH
    J Endod; 1986 Apr; 12(4):161-6. PubMed ID: 3461104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Are Ag-points, gutta percha and amalgam still applicable for apical sealing?].
    D'Haeseleire P; Thielens P; Bourgois F; Vanclooster R
    Acta Stomatol Belg; 1989 Dec; 86(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 2577746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Amalgam restoration and root filling, approximate fit and apical inadequacy].
    Molven O
    Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1971 May; 81(5):345-57. PubMed ID: 5282723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. A review.
    Abdullah SI; Mohammed H; Thayer KE
    Dent J; 1974 Apr; 40(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 4595416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of strength of various core restorative materials for endodontically treated anterior teeth.
    Dabas VK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2000; 11(4):139-44. PubMed ID: 11307637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On clinical corrosion of pins.
    Pameijer CH; Glantz PO; Mobasherat MA
    Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(4):161-7. PubMed ID: 6580757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Extra-pulpal retention of dental restorations--an alternative].
    Gronn NE
    Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1969 Jan; 79(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 5262179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Obturation of two root canals with paper points. 19 year follow-up. Report of a case.
    Bellizzi R
    N Y State Dent J; 1975 Apr; 41(4):218-22. PubMed ID: 1054809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of the use of Dycal with gutta-percha points as an endodontic filling technique.
    Goldberg F; Gurfinkel J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Jan; 47(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 32505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Importance of radiography in the diagnosis, planning and treatment of teeth to be restored with amalgam by pins].
    Pires JA
    RGO; 1979; 27(2):114-5. PubMed ID: 317748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of apical resections and reverse fillings on Thermafil root canal obturations.
    Baker PS; Oguntebi BR
    J Endod; 1990 May; 16(5):227-9. PubMed ID: 2074417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo corrosion behavior of gold-plated versus titanium dental retention pins.
    Palaghias G; Eliades G; Vougiouklakis G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Feb; 67(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 1538325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of three types of pins on compressive strength of dental amalgam.
    Duperon DF; Kasloff Z
    J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1971 Nov; 37(11):422-8. PubMed ID: 5288885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture resistance of roots filled with gutta-percha or RealSeal®.
    Lertchirakarn V; Poonkaew A; Messer H
    Int Endod J; 2011 Nov; 44(11):1005-10. PubMed ID: 21899563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Percentage of gutta-percha-filled areas in canals instrumented with nickel-titanium systems and obturated with matching single cones.
    Schäfer E; Köster M; Bürklein S
    J Endod; 2013 Jul; 39(7):924-8. PubMed ID: 23791265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Load fatigue of five restoration modalities in structurally compromised premolars.
    Fan P; Nicholls JI; Kois JC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 10348588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture strength of amalgam crowns with repaired endodontic access.
    Hachmeister KA; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF; Larsen RB
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 12022456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Anatomical restoration of deciduous molars by stainless steel crowns and by amalgam--a comparative study].
    Schenker P; Maréchaux SC; Joho JP
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed (1984); 1986 Aug; 96(8):946-55. PubMed ID: 3464091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.