These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4521865)

  • 21. American Medical Association policy of Professional Standards Review Organizations as amended and adopted by the House of Delegates, December, 1973.
    Conn Med; 1974 Feb; 38(2):71-2. PubMed ID: 4856002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The relationship between the Professional Standards Review Organizations and the State Health Department.
    McGarvey MR
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1982; 58(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 7052175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Establishing Professional Standards Review Organizations.
    Blackburn GL
    N Engl J Med; 1973 Jul; 289(1):48. PubMed ID: 4736177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Administration seeks replacement for nation's peer review organizations.
    Baldwin MF
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Jul; 16(14):44. PubMed ID: 10277188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The new era of utilization and quality control: professional review organizations.
    Mihalski EJ
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1984; 60(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 6370360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Peer review organizations expected to have major impact on UR.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1982 Nov; 7(11):136-7. PubMed ID: 10273331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Professional Standards Review--area designations: final regulations.
    Fed Regist; 1978 Jul; 43(129):29005-6. PubMed ID: 10273051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Professional standards review organizations, health systems agencies, and evaluation of the quality of medical care.
    Mosberg WH
    Neurosurgery; 1980 Apr; 6(4):472-3. PubMed ID: 7190232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Medical Professional Standards Review Organization: designation of alternate.
    Fed Regist; 1978 Jan; 43(19):3795-7. PubMed ID: 10306146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Disclosure of confidential information to and by professional review organizations.
    Roach WH
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1985 Dec; 6(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 10274706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The evaluation of Professional Standards Review Organizations: their part in the struggle to assure appropriate health care.
    Davis FA
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1982; 58(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 6810978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Statewide Professional Standards Review Councils: membership, organization, and duties of advisory groups.
    Fed Regist; 1978 Jan; 43(2):853-5. PubMed ID: 10306147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Looking back at the President's Commission.
    Capron AM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):7-10. PubMed ID: 6580285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Peer review organizations: implications for discharge planning.
    Granitir T
    Disch Plann Update; 1985; 5(3):4-10. PubMed ID: 10273644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Utilization and quality control peer review organizations: more than PSROs revisited.
    Gosfield AG
    Health Law Vigil; 1983 Apr; 6(7):2d suppl 1-3. PubMed ID: 10273335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perspectives. The expanding role of peer review.
    Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1986 Dec; 40(50):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10279854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Professional Standards Review Organization program.
    Nelson AR
    Conn Med; 1981 Jan; 45(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 6785004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bill continues funding for peer review organizations (PROs).
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1983 May; 8(5):59. PubMed ID: 10273352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. PSROs and internal hospital review.
    Farrell JR
    Hosp Prog; 1973 Oct; 54(10):64-6 passim. PubMed ID: 4795761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Critics say peer review organizations care more about costs than quality.
    Baldwin MF
    Mod Healthc; 1985 May; 15(10):34. PubMed ID: 10273641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.