These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4524475)

  • 21. The stability of the lower labial segment. A cephalometric survey.
    Mills JR
    Dent Pract Dent Rec; 1968 Apr; 18(8):293-306. PubMed ID: 5239066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Anteroposterior changes in tooth position as determined cephalometrically from gold implants.
    Mitchell DL; Capps WJ
    Am J Orthod; 1971 Jul; 60(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 5281451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A cephalometric study of mandibular development and its relationship to the mandibular and occlusal planes.
    Bennett GG; Kronman JH
    Angle Orthod; 1970 Apr; 40(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 5266012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Othodontic aspects of dental anthropology.
    Peck S; Peck H
    Angle Orthod; 1975 Apr; 45(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 1054945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Skeletal and dental changes with nonextraction Begg mechanotherapy in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Reddy P; Kharbanda OP; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 11113799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Cephalometric study of the vertical dimension of cases of class II, division I malocclusion, demonstrating a strong incisor supraclusion and treated by the Bimler therapeutic method].
    Stromboni Y; Mosse A
    Orthod Fr; 1973; 44(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 4534445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A cephalometric investigation of changes in lip separation following retraction of upper incisors.
    Birch RH; Huggins DG
    Dent Pract Dent Rec; 1966 Apr; 16(8):312-4. PubMed ID: 5218280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Visualized treatment objective: a simplified technique].
    Grinspon G; Learreta J
    Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1990; 24(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 2259811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A cephalometric comparison of cases treated with edgewise and Begg techniques.
    Barton JJ
    Angle Orthod; 1973 Jan; 43(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 4566913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Orthodontic treatment planning: do orthodontists treat to cephalometric norms?
    Al-Balkhi KM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Nov; 4(4):12-27. PubMed ID: 14625592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Short-term skeletal and dental effects of the Xbow appliance as measured on lateral cephalograms.
    Flores-Mir C; Barnett G; Higgins DW; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):822-32. PubMed ID: 19962605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.
    Nelson B; Hansen K; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology.
    Cha BK; Lee JY; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Yoshida N
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 17513876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [The compensation of post-treatment incisor torque in sagittal jaw relationship].
    Yang MZ; Xu TM; Lin JX
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Oct; 41(10):610-1. PubMed ID: 17129450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stability of occlusion after orthodontic treatment with tooth extraction in adult cases.
    Miyazaki H; Motegi E; Sebata M
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 Aug; 36(3):129-43. PubMed ID: 8689753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A cephalometric study of class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance.
    Covell DA; Trammell DW; Boero RP; West R
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Aug; 69(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 10456598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An assessment of the relationship of pre- and post-eruptive lower incisor position to the facial pattern by serial cephalometric radiography.
    Adams CP; Richardson A
    Rep Congr Eur Orthod Soc; 1967; ():213-23. PubMed ID: 5244890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mode of anterior cross-bite correction--a cephalometric study.
    Maheshwari PK; Kapoor DN; Jaiswal JN; Sharma VP
    J Indian Dent Assoc; 1979 Apr; 51(4):103-8. PubMed ID: 296201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 1. Hard tissue changes.
    Gill DS; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):465-72; quiz 517. PubMed ID: 15821691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. RAISING THE BITE. THE ORTHODONTIC APPROACH.
    RIDLEY DR
    Br Dent J; 1965 Mar; 118():188-9. PubMed ID: 14259325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.