182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4527163)
1. Where we stand: SCMA positions on medical and socio-economic subjects.
Hope HP
J S C Med Assoc; 1974 Jul; 70(7):233-41. PubMed ID: 4527163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Where we stand.
Calif Med; 1973 Dec; 119(6):42-59. PubMed ID: 4148533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Birth control and the private physician.
Silver MA
Fam Plann Perspect; 1972 Apr; 4(2):42-6. PubMed ID: 5052571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. HMOs: evaluating the pros and cons.
McCarthy C
Hosp Prog; 1974 Nov; 55(11):50-4. PubMed ID: 4413757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Should medical societies get into the HMO business?
Peck P
Physicians Manage; 1987 Jan; 27(1):59-60, 62. PubMed ID: 10281117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Third-party payers and the physician's duty of confidentiality.
Stratton WT
Kans Med; 1991 Apr; 92(4):92, 111-2. PubMed ID: 1881023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Responsibilities in obstetrics and gynaecology.
Peel J
Proc R Soc Med; 1968 Jul; 61(7):673-9. PubMed ID: 5664290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Health maintenance organizations and the rationing of medical care.
Luft HS
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1982; 60(2):268-306. PubMed ID: 6919772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Why does Dr. Bareis think, "almost all physicians abhor abortion?".
Kangley D
S D Med; 2006 Nov; 59(11):465. PubMed ID: 17180842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A physician views the directives.
Diamond EF
Hosp Prog; 1972 Nov; 53(11):56-60. PubMed ID: 5076344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Open letter to the S.C. PRO.
Schweiger DA; Bradham RR
J S C Med Assoc; 1988 Mar; 84(3):137-8. PubMed ID: 3361852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Health policy and the HMO.
Saward EW; Greenlick MR
Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1972 Apr; 50(2):147-76. PubMed ID: 5081747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Letter on abortion].
Vilella Suau F; Torres JM; Guzmán Lopez LR; Rigau J
Bol Asoc Med P R; 1994; 86(10-12):97-8. PubMed ID: 7857485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Primary care providers. The view from where I stand.
Neelon FA
N C Med J; 1999; 60(4):211. PubMed ID: 10424118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Service utilization comparison of South Carolina Medicaid fee-for-service (FFS), Physician Enhanced Plan (PEP) and Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) models.
Bradford WD
J S C Med Assoc; 2007 Oct; 103(8):223-7. PubMed ID: 18333589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Federal provider conscience regulation: unconscionable.
Card R
J Med Ethics; 2009 Aug; 35(8):471-2. PubMed ID: 19644003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Professional restraints on innovation in health care financing.
Havighurst CC
Duke Law J; 1978 May; (2):303-87. PubMed ID: 10239063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. U.S. medical practice before Medicare and now--differences and consequences.
Radovsky SS
N Engl J Med; 1990 Jan; 322(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 2403661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion and the unwanted child.
Guttmacher AF; Pilpel HF
Fam Plann Perspect; 1970 Mar; 2(2):16-24. PubMed ID: 5520624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Health care insurance premiums project.
Mich Med; 1999 Feb; 98(2):19-21. PubMed ID: 10074773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
