These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4528925)
21. [Influence of form and localization of proximal retention on amalgam restoration resistance]. de Lima Navarro MF; Franco EB; Mondelli J; Steagall L; Chinelatto LE Ars Curandi Odontol; 1980 Jan; 6(10):56-60. PubMed ID: 6933976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Amalgam restoration of molar cavities]. Watanabe A DE J Dent Eng; 1984; (69):8-9. PubMed ID: 6434249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Cavity preparations that extend the clinical longevity of amalgam restorations. Osborne JW; Summitt JB J Ala Dent Assoc; 1993; 77(3):12-8. PubMed ID: 8188974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [On the communications by János Szabó, Béla Herczeg, Jolán Bánóczy and Imre Szabó]. Verö B Fogorv Sz; 1992 May; 85(5):145-9; discussion 151-6. PubMed ID: 1291334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Proposals for the improvement of the quality of dental amalgam restorations]. Schneider H; Popa S Stomatologia (Bucur); 1973; 20(6):511-6. PubMed ID: 4520673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of manual and mechanical condensation of amalgam by dental students and by graduate dentists. Starr JM J Dent Educ; 1971 Mar; 35(3):183-4 passim. PubMed ID: 5278856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of three types of pins on compressive strength of dental amalgam. Duperon DF; Kasloff Z J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1971 Nov; 37(11):422-8. PubMed ID: 5288885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The composite resin-amalgam window preparation. Nelson JA Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 4(6):21-6. PubMed ID: 1391930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Improvement of the tooth cavity shape for amalgam filling]. Chen WQ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Ke Za Zhi; 1984 Mar; 19(1):46-7. PubMed ID: 6593190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Quality control of amalgam restorations. Part I. van Amerongen WE Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1979; 86(Suppl 17):32-42. PubMed ID: 298592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A two-, three-, and four-year follow-up of a clinical study of the effect of trituration on amalgam restorations. Osborne JW; Gale EN J Am Dent Assoc; 1974 Apr; 88(4):795-7. PubMed ID: 4521770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Modern concepts for the amalgam restoration. Wing G Dent Clin North Am; 1971 Jan; 15(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 4923234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Current aspects of amalgam restorations]. Steagall L; Netto NG Ars Curandi Odontol; 1977 Sep; 4(6):4-11. PubMed ID: 276328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Effects of different class II cavity designs on stresses in restoration]. Xu X; Sun Z; Tao L; Xiong H Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 37(6):446-8. PubMed ID: 12641960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of mercury-to-alloy ratios on line angle adaptation of dental amalgam. Simon JF; Welk DA J Dent Res; 1970; 49(5):1055-9. PubMed ID: 5272088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [The extensive amalgam restoration and retention possibilities]. Plasmans PJ; Vermeulen AH; de Jonge BA Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1985 Nov; 92(11):439-43. PubMed ID: 3868739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The Minamata convention on mercury and dental amalgam. Peretz B Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2014 Oct; 31(4):60. PubMed ID: 25549389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of marginal leakage of conventional and spherical alloy amalgams with and without stannous fluoride. Buonocore MG; Tani Y N Y State Dent J; 1968 Nov; 34(9):541-9. PubMed ID: 5245973 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Restoration with composite inlays. Amalgam substitute: restoration using a direct immediate inlay made of composite]. Rickli HP; Lutz F Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1990; 100(11):1336-43. PubMed ID: 2263938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]