These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4528940)
21. A cephalometric evaluation of hard- and soft-tissue changes during the third stage of Begg treatment. Cangialosi TJ; Meistrell ME Am J Orthod; 1982 Feb; 81(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 6960701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of two contrasting forms of orthodontic treatment on the facial profile. Looi LK; Mills JR Am J Orthod; 1986 Jun; 89(6):507-17. PubMed ID: 3459364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of activator treatment on class II malocclusions. Wieslander L; Lagerström L Am J Orthod; 1979 Jan; 75(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 283692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Soft tissue profile: a survey of African-American preference. Polk MS; Farman AG; Yancey JA; Gholston LR; Johnson BE; Regennitter FJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jul; 108(1):90-101. PubMed ID: 7598111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Mandibular incisor and skin profile in the Begg technic]. Couratier F Orthod Fr; 1977; 48():73-85. PubMed ID: 276833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A roentgenographic cephalometric study of changes in soft tissue profile related to orthodontic treatment. Branoff RS Am J Orthod; 1971 Sep; 60(3):305-6. PubMed ID: 5284937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Treatment and posttreatment changes with the Begg appliance. O'Reilly MT Am J Orthod; 1979 May; 75(5):535-47. PubMed ID: 286555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The relationship between hard and soft tissue changes following treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions using Edgewise and Fränkel appliance techniques. Battagel JM Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):154-65. PubMed ID: 2351200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Maxillary incisolabial responses in class II, division 1 treatment with Fränkel and Edgewise. Owen AH Angle Orthod; 1986 Jan; 56(1):67-87. PubMed ID: 3456736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cephalometric study of American black children with sickle-cell disease. Shnorhokian HI; Chapman DC; Nazif MM; Zullo TG ASDC J Dent Child; 1984; 51(6):431-3. PubMed ID: 6594357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Orthodontic incisor retraction caused changes in the soft tissue chin area: a retrospective study. Lu W; Zhang X; Mei L; Wang P; He J; Li Y; Zhao Z BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):108. PubMed ID: 32295586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of different incisor movements on the soft tissue profile measured in reference to a rough-surfaced palatal implant. Kuhn M; Markic G; Doulis I; Göllner P; Patcas R; Hänggi MP Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Mar; 149(3):349-57. PubMed ID: 26926022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparative analysis of intrusion of incisor teeth achieved in adults and children according to facial type. Otto RL; Anholm JM; Engel GA Am J Orthod; 1980 Apr; 77(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 6928744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Directional forces and favourable changes of A point in Class II, division 1 cases. Spyropoulos MN Eur J Orthod; 1980; 2(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 6935060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Facial soft-tissue shape changes after fixed edgewise treatment with premolar extraction in individual artificial-intelligence-classified facial profile patterns. Tanikawa C; Tan TJ; Takada K BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):740. PubMed ID: 38937790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Variation of the position and inclination of incisors in the sagittal plane using 2 modes of retention]. Fouché G Orthod Fr; 2000 Jan; 71(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 10838866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]