These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4530375)

  • 21. One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth.
    Gianordoli Neto R; Santiago SL; Mendonça JS; Passos VF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):26-33. PubMed ID: 18473024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Our future in restorative dental materials.
    Bayne SC
    J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(4):175-83. PubMed ID: 11323860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Longevity of the tooth/restoration complex: a review.
    Donovan TE
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2006 Feb; 34(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 16724467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Marginal leakage of restorative materials.
    Chandra S
    J Indian Dent Assoc; 1967 Sep; 39(9):134-8. PubMed ID: 5236654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of the Nd:YAP laser on coronal restorative materials: implications for endodontic retreatment.
    Blum JY; Peli JF; Abadie MJ
    J Endod; 2000 Oct; 26(10):588-92. PubMed ID: 11199799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Guidelines for the restoration of Class V lesions.
    Vandewalle KS; Vigil G
    Gen Dent; 1997; 45(3):254-60; quiz 265-6. PubMed ID: 9515427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Marginal leakage of various restorative materials.
    Hembree JH; Molinary SV
    Ark Dent J; 1974 Jun; 45(2):11-3. PubMed ID: 4210161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Are there acceptable alternatives to amalgam?
    Mackert JR; Wahl MJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Jul; 32(7):601-10. PubMed ID: 15468542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Five-year clinical evaluation of Dyract in small Class I cavities.
    Demirci M; Sancakli HS
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16555657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. New resin composites used to restore both anterior and posterior teeth.
    Cerutti A; Barabanti N
    Br Dent J; 2005 Apr; 198(7):447. PubMed ID: 15870815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reactions to marginal periodontal tissues to restorative procedures.
    Löe H
    Int Dent J; 1968 Dec; 18(4):759-78. PubMed ID: 5252711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.
    Burgess JO; Gallo JR; Ripps AH; Walker RS; Ireland EJ
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Clinical comparison of filling materials for anterior and posterior teeth. FDI Commission on Dental Products, Instruments Equipment and Therapeutic Agents (COMIET), G.T. Clinical trials. The French version: INCOGUDET].
    Int Dent J; 1977 Sep; 27(3):301-12. PubMed ID: 270470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of core material on fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of restored root filled teeth.
    Reill MI; Rosentritt M; Naumann M; Handel G
    Int Endod J; 2008 May; 41(5):424-30. PubMed ID: 18355251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The ideal restorative material].
    Davidson CL
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1996 Nov; 103(11):435-6. PubMed ID: 11921984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
    Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ideal restorative material sought.
    Dent Dig; 1966 Jul; 72(7):299. PubMed ID: 5220255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.