These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4532162)
1. A survey of dental implants with emphasis on the vitredent endosteal carbon implant. Bauer C; Bellot P J South Calif State Dent Hyg Assoc; 1972; 15(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 4532162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Parameters affecting the stress distribution around LTI carbon and aluminum oxide dental implants. Cook SD; Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Nov; 16(6):875-85. PubMed ID: 7174713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of implant elastic modulus on the stress distribution around LTI carbon and aluminum oxide dental implants. Cook SD; Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Nov; 15(6):879-87. PubMed ID: 7309769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Progress in the evaluation of a vitreous carbon endosteal implant. Grenoble DE; Kim RL Ariz Dent J; 1973; 19(1):12-9 passim. PubMed ID: 4510321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The vitreous carbon endosteal implant. A single tooth replacement system. Lee TC Sci Educ J; 1973; 6(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 4520821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative histologic evaluation of LTI carbon, carbon-coated aluminum oxide and uncoated aluminum oxide dental implants. Cook SD; Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ; Kent JN J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 May; 17(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 6863353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Teaching implant dentistry in the predoctoral curriculum: a report from the ADEA Implant Workshop's survey of deans. Petropoulos VC; Arbree NS; Tarnow D; Rethman M; Malmquist J; Valachovic R; Brunson WD; Alfano MC J Dent Educ; 2006 May; 70(5):580-8. PubMed ID: 16687644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prosthodontic program directors' perceptions regarding implant placement by prosthodontic residents: a 2004 survey conducted by the Educational Policy Subcommittee of the American College of Prosthodontists. Sukotjo C; Arbree NS J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):662-8. PubMed ID: 18761568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cemented-retained vs screw-retained implant restorations: an investigation on 1939 dental implants. Cicciù M; Beretta M; Risitano G; Maiorana C Minerva Stomatol; 2008 Apr; 57(4):167-79. PubMed ID: 18427361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a predoctoral implant curriculum: does such a program influence graduates' practice patterns? Huebner GR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):543-9. PubMed ID: 12182297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The retention mechanics of LTI carbon, carbon-coated aluminum oxide, and uncoated aluminum oxide dental implants. Cook SD; Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 Sep; 17(5):873-83. PubMed ID: 6352708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective investigation of the single-crystal sapphire endosteal dental implant in humans: ten-year results. Steflik DE; Koth DL; Robinson FG; McKinney RV; Davis BC; Morris CF; Davis QB J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 7473873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Various applications of endosteal implants. Smith CH Dent Images; 1974; 14(3):13-7. PubMed ID: 4614990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Endosteal implants. Indications and contraindications for their use in general practice. Meyer S N Y State Dent J; 1973; 39(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 4575482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]