244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4533330)
1. [Reduced radiation load using new rectanguler tube].
Taugerbeck R
Quintessenz J; 1974 Nov; 4(11):25-6. PubMed ID: 4533330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Is it ethical not to...?
Brooks SL
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):493. PubMed ID: 11346721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [A plate for the fixation of X-ray films for dental roentgenographies in dogs with a view to radiation prevention of working personnel].
Bakalova L
Stomatologiia (Sofiia); 1975; 57(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 1076878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of BID length and shape on the surface area and volume of tissue exposed during dental radiography.
Hardman PK; Masood F
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Feb; 6(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 15719072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Dental radiodiagnosis--radiation exposure and radiation protection].
Rother U; Spens E; Taschner P
Stomatol DDR; 1982 Oct; 32(10):708-15. PubMed ID: 6963801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Modernizing your office for oral radiography.
Preece JW
Tex Dent J; 1995 Feb; 112(2):23, 25, 27-9. PubMed ID: 8633302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. X-rays: keeping the doses down.
Russell JG; Gray JE
World Health Forum; 1992; 13(2-3):213-7. PubMed ID: 1418351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Status X, equipment for panoramic photographs in intraoral dental radiographic diagnosis].
Meinel F
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1972 Dec; 27(12):943-9. PubMed ID: 4510035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A recording exposure control for x-ray machines.
Hurst GS; Thonnard N; Schneider K
Health Phys; 1971 Jul; 21(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 5114665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Working safely with x-rays].
Arnold LV
Rev Belge Med Dent; 1977; 32(4):371-90. PubMed ID: 273959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Universal autonomic ID-01 device for recording a dosage load on the patient].
Vladimirov LV; Chikirdin EG
Med Tekh; 1997; (1):11-3. PubMed ID: 9148065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Results of 33,911 x-ray protection surveys of facilities with medical or dental diagnostic x-ray equipment, fiscal years 1961-1968.
Fess LR; McDowell RB; Jameson WR; Alcox RW
Radiol Health Data Rep; 1970 Nov; 11(11):581-612. PubMed ID: 5497054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Dose measurement in panoramic x-rays of the dentition with thermoluminescence dosimetry].
Regulla DF; Ricci A; Sonnabend E
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1972 Jan; 27(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 4500670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of radiation doses received during examinations with the pantomograph, orthopantomograph, Panorex, Status-X and conventional roentgen apparatus.
Altonen M; Heikkilä M; Mattila K
Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1974 Apr; 70(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 4831509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation protection for dental professionals.
Edwards C
Dent Assist (1931); 1985; 54(6):13-36. PubMed ID: 3866694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Limited exposure.
Lusk LT
RDH; 1995 Feb; 15(2):39, 41-2. PubMed ID: 8619087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Alberta x-ray protection program.
Wetherill JM
J Can Dent Assoc; 1981 Apr; 47(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 7026000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Certified radiation safety officers program. The Nassau County experience, 1990-1992.
Goren AD; Sciubba JJ; Moskowitz GW; Lorio PM; Heller MB
N Y State Dent J; 1993 Nov; 59(9):63-5. PubMed ID: 8247460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Improvement of radiation hygiene with Kodak Ektaspeed dental radiographic film].
Rotgans J
Quintessenz; 1983 Apr; 34(4):703-10. PubMed ID: 6576411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Sub-standard dental X-ray units.
Fenton DM
J Ir Dent Assoc; 1996; 42(1):2. PubMed ID: 9242111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
