These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Influence of occlusion on the degradation of posterior composite resins. Leinfelder KF; Small B Dent Today; 1998 Nov; 17(11):44-50. PubMed ID: 10752417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness. Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Normalizing method for determining the mode of crack-propagation in amalgams and composite resins]. Hanawa T; Ota M; Marker VA; Okabe T Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1989 Nov; 8(6):858-61. PubMed ID: 2489600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Composite or amalgam? Not a black or white decision]. Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Burgersdijk RC Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1992 Oct; 99(10):371-4. PubMed ID: 11820006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Amalgam. VIII. Substitute for amalgam: the biocompatibility of composite restorations]. Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Sep; 100(9):389-91. PubMed ID: 11822149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Effects of different class II cavity designs on stresses in restoration]. Xu X; Sun Z; Tao L; Xiong H Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 37(6):446-8. PubMed ID: 12641960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Filling material in view: composites and amalgam]. Kimmel K Quintessenz J; 1977 Nov; 7(11):23-5. PubMed ID: 284437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The composite resin restoration: a literature review, Part III. What the future holds. Full CA; Hollander WR ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 8432949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Esthetic veneering of amalgam restorations with composite resin--combining the best of both worlds? Plasmans PJ; Reukers EA Oper Dent; 1993; 18(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 8337184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alternatives to amalgam. Lyons K N Z Dent J; 1997 Jun; 93(412):47-50. PubMed ID: 9293745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Use of composite resins for repairing molars, with special reference to their differences from amalgam]. Hosoda H; Takatsu T DE J Dent Eng; 1983; (65):1-15. PubMed ID: 6409511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture resistance of Class II approximal slot restorations. Yaman SD; Yetmez M; Türköz E; Akkas N J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 11005902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]