These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4535078)

  • 1. A study of marginal leakage of burnished and unburnished amalgam restorations in vitro subjected to thermal stress.
    Marfaria AT; Dessi VM
    J Indian Dent Assoc; 1973 Sep; 45(9):253-7. PubMed ID: 4535078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re-intervention in glass ionomer restorations: what comes next?
    Burke FJ; Lucarotti PS
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 18819740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of 4-META adhesive on bond strength and marginal seal of amalgam restorations and repairs--an in vitro study.
    George S; Kuriakose S; Jayalatha NS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1996 Jun; 14(2):52-5. PubMed ID: 9522758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Veneering amalgam restorations.
    Gourley JM; Ambrose ER
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1982 Jan; 48(1):49-50. PubMed ID: 7034911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of pre- and postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of amalgam and composite restorations.
    Ulukapi H; Benderli Y; Ulukapi I
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):505-8. PubMed ID: 12946068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adhesive restoration of an endodontically treated incisor.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1993 May; 24(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 8362045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal micro leakage at cementum-amalgam interface; an in vitro study.
    Bhat KS; Murthy KS
    J Indian Dent Assoc; 1974 Nov; 46(11):421-6. PubMed ID: 4535421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Burnished amalgam restorations: a two-year clinical evaluation.
    Leinfelder KF; Strickland WD; Wall JT; Taylor DF
    Oper Dent; 1978; 3(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 289103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro assessment of marginal leakage of combined amalgam-sealant restorations on occlusal surfaces of permanent posterior teeth.
    Fuks AB; Shey Z
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1983; 50(6):425-9. PubMed ID: 6581182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resin-composite restorations.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ; Gruythuysen RJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(4-5):310-4. PubMed ID: 8258575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reducing microleakage in composite resin restorations: an in vitro study.
    Unlu N; Krakaya S; Ozer F; Say EC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2003 Dec; 11(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 14737794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Composite resin-amalgam compound restorations.
    Franchi M; Trisi P; Montanari G; Piattelli A
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):577-82. PubMed ID: 7568708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage of class 2 Superbond-lined composite restorations with and without a cervical amalgam base.
    Hovav S; Holan G; Lewinstein I; Fuks AB
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 8700773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial.
    Moncada GC; Martin J; Fernandez E; Vildosola PG; Caamano C; Caro MJ; Mjor IA; Gordan VV
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(5):314-8. PubMed ID: 17004564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years.
    Wilkie R; Lidums A; Smales R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surface morphology of burnished versus non-burnished amalgam restorations.
    Katora ME; Moore PA; Jubach TS
    Quintessence Int Dent Dig; 1979 Aug; 10(8):93-4. PubMed ID: 298675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Change in size of replaced amalgam restorations: a methodological study.
    Mjör IA; Reep RL; Kubilis PS; Mondragón BE
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):272-7. PubMed ID: 9863449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.