These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4535078)
1. A study of marginal leakage of burnished and unburnished amalgam restorations in vitro subjected to thermal stress. Marfaria AT; Dessi VM J Indian Dent Assoc; 1973 Sep; 45(9):253-7. PubMed ID: 4535078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage. Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re-intervention in glass ionomer restorations: what comes next? Burke FJ; Lucarotti PS J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 18819740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of 4-META adhesive on bond strength and marginal seal of amalgam restorations and repairs--an in vitro study. George S; Kuriakose S; Jayalatha NS J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1996 Jun; 14(2):52-5. PubMed ID: 9522758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study. Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro assessment of marginal leakage of combined amalgam-sealant restorations on occlusal surfaces of permanent posterior teeth. Fuks AB; Shey Z ASDC J Dent Child; 1983; 50(6):425-9. PubMed ID: 6581182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resin-composite restorations. Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ; Gruythuysen RJ ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(4-5):310-4. PubMed ID: 8258575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing microleakage in composite resin restorations: an in vitro study. Unlu N; Krakaya S; Ozer F; Say EC Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2003 Dec; 11(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 14737794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage of class 2 Superbond-lined composite restorations with and without a cervical amalgam base. Hovav S; Holan G; Lewinstein I; Fuks AB Oper Dent; 1995; 20(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 8700773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial. Moncada GC; Martin J; Fernandez E; Vildosola PG; Caamano C; Caro MJ; Mjor IA; Gordan VV Gen Dent; 2006; 54(5):314-8. PubMed ID: 17004564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years. Wilkie R; Lidums A; Smales R Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surface morphology of burnished versus non-burnished amalgam restorations. Katora ME; Moore PA; Jubach TS Quintessence Int Dent Dig; 1979 Aug; 10(8):93-4. PubMed ID: 298675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Change in size of replaced amalgam restorations: a methodological study. Mjör IA; Reep RL; Kubilis PS; Mondragón BE Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):272-7. PubMed ID: 9863449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]