These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4535078)
21. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Restoration of severely discolored maxillary anterior teeth with porcelain laminate veneers. Jun SK; Wilson S Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 20(5):285-7. PubMed ID: 18649829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of design features and restorative techniques on marginal leakage of MO composites: an in vitro study. Wilson J Oper Dent; 1993; 18(4):155-9. PubMed ID: 8152984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations. Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Adhesive restorations with amalgam: guidelines for the clinician. Gwinnett AJ; Baratieri LN; Monteiro S; Ritter AV Quintessence Int; 1994 Oct; 25(10):687-95. PubMed ID: 9161246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Factors associated with amalgam restorations in Taiwan. Hu SW; Yang LC; Chang HY Br Dent J; 2002 Oct; 193(7):411-4. PubMed ID: 12420015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using dentin bonding system primers. Berry FA; Parker SD; Rice D; Muñoz CA Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):174-8. PubMed ID: 9002794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Marginal failure of amalgam. Effect of alloy selection and bite forces. Dérand T Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 6576493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study). Kamel FM Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Occlusal glass ionomer cermet, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study. Lidums A; Wilkie R; Smales R Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 7803005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of techniques for the evaluation of marginal adaptation of amalgam restorations. Mjör IA; Ryge G Int Dent J; 1981 Mar; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 7009431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study. Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An in vitro study of the effect of restorative technique on marginal leakage in posterior composites. Neiva IF; de Andrada MA; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):282-9. PubMed ID: 9855849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years. Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; Al-Zaher I Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Long term sealing properties of Amalgambond under amalgam restorations. Ben-Amar A; Liberman R; Rothkoff Z; Cardash HS Am J Dent; 1994 Jun; 7(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 7993602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of a resin-based desensitizing agent and a self-etching dentin adhesive on marginal leakage of amalgam restorations. Ghavamnasiri M; Alavi M; Alavi S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Nov; 8(7):54-61. PubMed ID: 17994155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]