These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4535985)

  • 1. Biocompatibility of acrylic resins implants in connective tissue.
    Nagem-Filho H; Chiodi-Netto J; De Araujo PA
    Estomatol Cult; 1973; 7(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 4535985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Esthetic pontic materials--biocompatibility and scanning electron microscopic study.
    Nasr HH; Iskander KG; el Karaksi AO
    Egypt Dent J; 1989 Jul; 35(3):215-30. PubMed ID: 2487298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparative analysis of tissue reaction to acrylic resin materials in studies on Wistar strain rats].
    Sobolewska E
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1999; 45():253-64. PubMed ID: 10909494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Reaction of the subcutaneous connective tissue of the rat to implants of chemically active acrylic resins. Histologic study].
    Grecco AJ; Sakima T; Lia RC; de Toledo OA; Motta ME
    Ars Curandi Odontol; 1976; 3(2):15-9. PubMed ID: 1073200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cementation of dental implants: rationale and preliminary observations.
    Zarb GA; Melcher AH; Smith DC
    J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1972 Sep; 38(9):328-32. PubMed ID: 4562091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of tissue reaction to some denture-base materials: an animal study.
    Ebadian B; Razavi M; Soleimanpour S; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):67-74. PubMed ID: 18473029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Porous methyl methacrylate as an implant material.
    Taylor DF; Smith FB
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1972; 6(1):467-79. PubMed ID: 5014905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Histologic study of the rat connective tissue response to acrylic resin reinforced zinc-oxide-eugenol cements].
    Maffeis E; de Toledo OA; Lia RC
    Rev Fac Farm Odontol Araraquara; 1974; 8(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 4535885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biocompatibility of Macor glass ceramic.
    Gibbons DF
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Mar; 14(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 7358746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cell and tissue reactions to composites and newly-developed restoration resins (Isosit) in a biological experiment].
    Welker D; Neupert G; Katenkamp D
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1980; 68(7):659-67. PubMed ID: 6451999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of material characteristics, of surface topography and of implant components and connections on soft tissue integration: a literature review.
    Rompen E; Domken O; Degidi M; Pontes AE; Piattelli A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():55-67. PubMed ID: 16968382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Histopathologic reactions of rat connective tissue to calcium hydroxide paste implants].
    Lóssio AG; Mendes Filho A; Gomes Ede L; Lóssio JJ
    Rev Fac Odontol Sao Paulo; 1977; 15(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 291093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Special report: the interfacial behavior of biomaterials, 1979.
    Hench LL
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Nov; 14(6):803-11. PubMed ID: 7052209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Histologic observation of soft tissue responses to implanted, multifaceted particles and discs of hydroxylapatite.
    Drobeck HP; Rothstein SS; Gumaer KI; Sherer AD; Slighter RG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1984 Mar; 42(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 6321707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Tissue reaction after implantation of ceramic biomaterials with introduced electrokinetic zeta potential on surface].
    Lewandowski R; Rutowski R; Staniszewska-Kuś J; Pielka S; Wnukiewicz B
    Polim Med; 2004; 34(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 15222224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biocompatibility of tissue conditioners--histological study in rats.
    Passeri LA; de Carvalho AC
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1985 Sep; 27(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 3866007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Pathomorphology of the subcutaneous implantation of samples of base polymer materials modified by plasma glow discharge].
    Vlasova LF; Nepomniashchikh LM; Petrov AK; Reznikova EO
    Biull Eksp Biol Med; 2000 Feb; 129(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 10732253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Histological studies of the biocompatibility of glass-carbon and bio-vitreous ceramics in muscle tissue. 1: Implantation of solids].
    Raabe G; Müller P; Thieme V; Hofmann H; Findeisen B; Berger G
    Stomatol DDR; 1986 Feb; 36(2):53-60. PubMed ID: 3461591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response of oral tissues to implants totally covered by mucous membrane.
    Weinberg S; Moncarz V
    Oral Sci Rev; 1974; 5(0):68-84. PubMed ID: 4601648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biocompatibility of posterior restorative materials.
    Schuster GS; Lefebvre CA; Wataha JC; White SN
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):17-31. PubMed ID: 9120609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.