These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

52 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4536319)

  • 1. [Statistical studies of cephalometric values in Class II/2 malocclusions].
    Darqué J; Bougues R; Casteigt J; Duhart AM; Fabaron JP; Pujol A
    Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1974 Jan; 8(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 4536319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusions in transitional dentition.
    Kapoor S; Kapoor DN; Jaiswal JN
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Dec; 19(4):127-33. PubMed ID: 12396087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Correction of cephalometric landmarks in 100 patients with Angle Class II/1 anomalies with the basic plan angle (B-angle)].
    Sterzik G; Bredy E; Wortha HP
    Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1988; 20(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 3165957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive value of morphologic parameters for successful correction of Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Zentner A; Peylo S; Brothag D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 12637900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Midfacial and mandibular morphometry of children with Class II and Class III malocclusions.
    Chang HP; Lin HC; Liu PH; Chang CH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 32(9):642-7. PubMed ID: 16102076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Cephalometric studies of Class II, division 2 malocclusion].
    Maj G; Lucchese FP
    Orthod Fr; 1980; 51():239-45. PubMed ID: 6941164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
    Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Angle Class II, division 2, malocclusions].
    Spyropoulos MN; Marangou-Papaioannou O
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1984; 38(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 6443404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Upper and lower pharyngeal airways in subjects with Class I and Class II malocclusions and different growth patterns.
    de Freitas MR; Alcazar NM; Janson G; de Freitas KM; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):742-5. PubMed ID: 17169736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cephalometric characteristics of Angle II/1 anomaly].
    Rehák G; Báder J; Horváth J
    Fogorv Sz; 1987 Oct; 80(10):303-7. PubMed ID: 3479339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of second molar eruption patterns in patients with skeletal Class II and skeletal Class I malocclusions.
    Brin I; Camasuvi S; Dali N; Aizenbud D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):746-51. PubMed ID: 17169737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Critical study of the cephalometric evaluation of Angle Class II using the McNamara line].
    Amoric M
    Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1985 Oct; 19(4):563-8. PubMed ID: 3869865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cephalometric study of Class II malocclusions treated with mandibular surgery.
    Burden D; Johnston C; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17208097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dentoskeletal treatment changes in Class II subdivision malocclusions in submentovertex and posteroanterior radiographs.
    Janson G; Cruz KS; Woodside DG; Metaxas A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Oct; 126(4):451-63. PubMed ID: 15470348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Janson M; Nakamura A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):861-8. PubMed ID: 18538250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
    Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
    Waters D; Harris EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in cranial base morphology in different malocclusions.
    Polat OO; Kaya B
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Nov; 10(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 17973688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Occlusal outcomes and efficiency of 1- and 2-phase protocols in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Cançado RH; Pinzan A; Janson G; Henriques JF; Neves LS; Canuto CE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):245-53; quiz 328.e1-2. PubMed ID: 18249291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prevalence of malocclusions in a young Brazilian population.
    Grando G; Young AA; Vedovello Filho M; Vedovello SA; Ramirez-Yañez GO
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2008; 19(2):13-6. PubMed ID: 18686678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.