These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4540945)

  • 1. Approximate tests of independence in contingency tables from complex stratified cluster samples.
    Nathan G
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1973 Mar; (53):1-14. PubMed ID: 4540945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Testing the independence of special incomplete 2-dimensional contingency tables].
    Enke H
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1981 Oct; 27(10):796-9. PubMed ID: 7314710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The normal curve as an approximation to the binomial distribution (for large samples) properties of the normal curve standardized normal curve application to a large binomial sample standard error of the proportion.
    Bahn AK
    Woman Physician; 1970 Jan; 25(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 5420859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alternative tests for heterogeneity of variance; some Monte Carlo results.
    Pearson ES
    Biometrika; 1966 Jun; 53(1):229-34. PubMed ID: 5964061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of two sample proportions by the normal difference test. Distribution of chance differences between two sample proportions. Standard error of the difference between two sample proportions. Location of a sample difference on the distribution of chance differences.
    Bahn AK
    Woman Physician; 1970 Feb; 25(2):97-113. PubMed ID: 5463321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Chi-square statistics based on block-triangular tables].
    Agung IG
    Majalah Demografi Indones; 1986 Dec; 13(26):iv, 49-60. PubMed ID: 12314597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation of the ranges of correlated samples.
    Mardia KV
    Biometrika; 1967 Dec; 54(3):529-39. PubMed ID: 6064014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computation of the quasi-independence model for the analysis of triangular contingency tables.
    Aktaş S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Jan; 89(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 18037188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Sampling values for assessing the dynamics of frequency indices in biomedical research].
    Minchenko VA; Prusakov VM; Burdeĭnaia TF; Bochkov NP
    Gig Sanit; 1986 Jan; (1):27-30. PubMed ID: 3949202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Parameter tests with special attention to Student's test].
    Cattaneo AD
    Minerva Anestesiol; 1968 May; 34(5):657-60. PubMed ID: 5736765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incomplete split plot designs.
    Robinson J
    Biometrics; 1967 Dec; 23(4):793-802. PubMed ID: 6080211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The score test for independence in R x C contingency tables with missing data.
    Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):751-62. PubMed ID: 8672711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of prior distributions in the design of experiments for parameter estimation in non-linear situations.
    Draper NR; Hunter WG
    Biometrika; 1967 Jun; 54(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 6049531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variances of selection differentials in normal samples.
    Burrows PM
    Biometrics; 1975 Mar; 31(1):125-33. PubMed ID: 1164528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory.".
    Schoonhoven CB
    Adm Sci Q; 1981 Sep; 26(3):349-77. PubMed ID: 10252610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. F-ratio probabilities from binomial tables.
    Mantel N
    Biometrics; 1966 Jun; 22(2):404-7. PubMed ID: 5961454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inference for some incompletely specified models involving normal approximations to discrete data.
    Kale BK; Bancroft TA
    Biometrics; 1967 Jun; 23(2):335-48. PubMed ID: 6051596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The development of tables for optimal sample sizes using tests based on binomial distributions (author's transl)].
    Bortz J; Osterreich R; Vogelbusch W
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1979; 131(4):267-92. PubMed ID: 547977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monte Carlo investigation of a model for competing risks.
    Atta GJ; Kimball AW
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1968 Mar; 40(3):525-34. PubMed ID: 5644203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relation between score tests and approximate UMPU tests in exponential models common in biometry.
    Gart JJ; Tarone RE
    Biometrics; 1983 Sep; 39(3):781-6. PubMed ID: 6652208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.