132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4542647)
1. Contact sensitivity in the mouse. X. Non-specific cytotoxicity of T blasts in the draining lymph nodes.
Asherson GL; Ferluga J
Immunology; 1973 Sep; 25(3):471-83. PubMed ID: 4542647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contact sensitivity in the mouse. XI. Movement of T blasts in the draining lymph nodes to sites of inflammation.
Asherson GL; Allwood GG; Mayhew B
Immunology; 1973 Sep; 25(3):485-94. PubMed ID: 4542648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The migratory behavior of T blasts to contact sensitivity reactions in activelyand passively sensitized mice.
Allwood GG
Immunology; 1975 Apr; 28(4):681-92. PubMed ID: 1080131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro induction of tumor specific immunity: requirements for T lymphocytes and tumor growth inhibition in vivo.
Röllinghoff M; Wagner H
Eur J Immunol; 1973 Aug; 3(8):471-6. PubMed ID: 4543174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Contact sensitivity in the mouse. IX. The role of immunological and non-immunological inflammation in the movement of lymphocytes to immunized lymph nodes.
Asherson GL; Barnes RM
Immunology; 1973 May; 24(5):885-94. PubMed ID: 4715261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional heterogeneity of murine lymphoid cells. 3. Differential responsiveness of T cells to phytohemagglutinin and concanavalin A as a probe for T cell subsets.
Stobo JD; Paul WE
J Immunol; 1973 Feb; 110(2):362-75. PubMed ID: 4119248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. T cell synergy in mixed lymphocyte culture-induced cytolysis.
Häyry P; Andersson LC
Eur J Immunol; 1974 Feb; 4(2):145-7. PubMed ID: 4277680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of the T suppressor cell circuit which regulates contact sensitivity in mice infected with the virus of Newcastle disease.
Salerno A; Colonna Romano G; Dieli F; Colizzi V
Immunology; 1984 Feb; 51(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 6229474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hapten-specific virus-replication T cells: analysis of the functional role in contact sensitivity.
Takahashi C; Katsura Y
J Immunol; 1980 Jun; 124(6):2721-7. PubMed ID: 6154737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. T cell recognition of cell surface antigens. I. Specificity.
Wekerle H; Feldman M
Eur J Immunol; 1974 Apr; 4(4):240-6. PubMed ID: 4137229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Biphasic T cell proliferation in the regional lymph node of contact-sensitized mice].
Nishioka K; Katayma I; Sano S; Dohi Y
Nihon Hifuka Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Apr; 94(5):611-4. PubMed ID: 6332218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFA in mice. VIII. Identification of distinct T cell subpopulations that mediate in vivo and in vitro manifestations of delayed hypersensitivity.
Moorhead JW
J Immunol; 1978 Jan; 120(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 304865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFB in mice. 3. Transfer of tolerance with "suppressor T cells".
Phanupak P; Moorhead JW; Claman HN
J Immunol; 1974 Oct; 113(4):1230-6. PubMed ID: 4547338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The genetic control of T cell-meditated immunity. I. Characterization of a mouse strain whose low responsiveness is inherited as a recessive trait.
Vachek H; Kölsch E
Immunology; 1974 Oct; 27(4):507-15. PubMed ID: 4215740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regulation of T lymphocyte trafficking into lymph nodes during an immune response by the chemokines macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1 alpha and MIP-1 beta.
Tedla N; Wang HW; McNeil HP; Di Girolamo N; Hampartzoumian T; Wakefield D; Lloyd A
J Immunol; 1998 Nov; 161(10):5663-72. PubMed ID: 9820547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrophoretic fractionation of mouse T and B lymphocytes. Efficiency of the method and purity of separated cells.
Häyry P; Andersson LC; Nordling S
Transplant Proc; 1973 Mar; 5(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 4572149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Thymus-dependent (T) lymphocytes in the rat.
Balch CM; Feldman JD
J Immunol; 1974 Jan; 112(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 4590829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Differential effect of azathioprine on theta-antigenicity of mouse lymphocytes.
Poulter LW; Bradley NJ; Turk JL
Immunology; 1974 Apr; 26(4):777-85. PubMed ID: 4546773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Divergent immunological responses following glutaraldehyde exposure.
Azadi S; Klink KJ; Meade BJ
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2004 May; 197(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15126069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Studies on the induction and expression of T cell-mediated immunity. I. Blocking of cell-mediated cytolysis by membrane antigens.
Bonavida B
J Immunol; 1974 Mar; 112(3):926-34. PubMed ID: 4544178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
