These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4544208)

  • 21. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Suppression of tinnitus by electric stimulation in cochlear implant patients].
    Battmer RD; Heermann R; Laszig R
    HNO; 1989 Apr; 37(4):148-52. PubMed ID: 2785982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing temporal modulation sensitivity using electrically evoked auditory steady state responses.
    Luke R; Van Deun L; Hofmann M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():37-45. PubMed ID: 25746913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Symposium on sensorineural hearing loss in children: early detection and intervention. Hearing aids for young children.
    Ross M
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1975 Feb; 8(1):125-41. PubMed ID: 1090883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Cochlear Implant Performance Prognostic Test Based on Electrical Field Interactions Evaluated by eABR (Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses).
    Guevara N; Hoen M; Truy E; Gallego S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155008. PubMed ID: 27149268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Editorial: Transdermal electrostimulation therapy.
    Tonndorf J
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1974 Aug; 100(2):107-8. PubMed ID: 4602016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids.
    Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Feb; 63(2):533-49. PubMed ID: 670550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A solid state delayed auditory feedback system for speech therapy.
    Pollock R; Gregory NL; Shaw A
    Biomed Eng; 1976 Dec; 11(12):413-4. PubMed ID: 1016678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Transdermal electrostimulation in sensory hearing loss.
    Hughes EC; Arthur RH; Whitaker CW
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1974 Aug; 100(2):100-7. PubMed ID: 4602015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A cochlear implant round window electrode array.
    Clark GM; Patrick JF; Bailey Q
    J Laryngol Otol; 1979 Feb; 93(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 429893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Binaural jitter improves interaural time-difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates.
    Laback B; Majdak P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jan; 105(2):814-7. PubMed ID: 18182489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Transdermal electrostimulation therapy. Lack of therapeutic effect.
    Gerken GM; Glorig A; Roeser R
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1974 Aug; 100(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 4602014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Articulatory training of the deaf using low-frequency surrogate fricatives.
    Guttman N; Levitt H; Bellefleur PA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1970 Mar; 13(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 5421133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pure-tone thresholds and word-recognition abilities of hearing-impaired children.
    Erber NP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Jun; 17(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 4836040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.
    Scheperle RA; Tejani VD; Omtvedt JK; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Oleson JJ; Ozanne MV
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():45-57. PubMed ID: 28432874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.
    Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Clinical studies on temporary characteristics of hearing].
    Belov IM
    Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1968; 28(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 5737148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [New hearing test for functional deafness--the procedure to estimate the genuine hearing threshold].
    Iizuka N; Satoh T; Yamane M
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1999 Sep; 102(9):1028-35. PubMed ID: 10554555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A hearing prosthesis for severe perceptive deafness--experimental studies.
    Clark GM
    J Laryngol Otol; 1973 Oct; 87(10):929-45. PubMed ID: 4593743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of tinnitus specific intracochlear stimulation on speech perception in patients with unilateral or asymmetric hearing loss accompanied with tinnitus and the effect of formal auditory training.
    Arts RAGJ; George ELJ; Janssen MAML; Griessner A; Zierhofer C; Stokroos RJ
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(6):426-439. PubMed ID: 29188740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.