These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4546436)

  • 1. College expresses concern on fetal research legislative proposals.
    J Leg Med (N Y); 1974; 2(4):45-6. PubMed ID: 4546436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. National Research Act: restores training, bans fetal research.
    Culliton BJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1974 Sep; 4(4):12-3. PubMed ID: 4457507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation: commentary.
    Rosensaft J
    Man Med; 1978; 3(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 10316738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation.
    Himmelsbach CK; Sliwinski AJ; Lorber M; Mossman KL
    Man Med; 1978; 3(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 10316736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conference report on S. 540, a bill to amend the Public Health Service Act to establish a National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, and for other purposes.
    Dingell JD
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1984 Oct; 130(131):H11339-60. PubMed ID: 11658583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The regulation of fetal tissue transplantation: different legislative models for different purposes.
    Hicks SC
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):1613-29. PubMed ID: 11657050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Public Law 99-158.
    United States
    US Statut Large; 1985; 99(Title IV Sections 1-12):. PubMed ID: 11686169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bioethical catch-22: the moratorium on federal funding of fetal tissue transplantation research and the NIH revitalization amendments.
    Maroney HM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():485-519. PubMed ID: 10126947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proposed amendment to H.R. 8510 prohibiting use of federal funds for fetal experimentation.
    Roncallo Ae
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1973 Jun; 119(98):H5181-7. PubMed ID: 11664201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion's scientific angle is affecting appointments.
    Brazda JF
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Dec; 19(49):34. PubMed ID: 10296202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal research--the legislative answer.
    Core RS
    West VA Law Rev; 1976 Feb; 78(2):230-46. PubMed ID: 11664597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Management operations of the National Cancer Institute that influence the governance of science.
    Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1984 May; 64():1-139. PubMed ID: 6749243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Agencies look to improve informed consent.
    Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5275):567. PubMed ID: 11644820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Women of childbearing potential in clinical research: perspectives on NIH policy and liability issues.
    Hayunga EG; Rothenberg KH; Pinn VW
    Food Drug Cosmet Med Device Law Dig; 1996 Jan; 13(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 11660302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legislative highlights. The relationship between diet and disease.
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1978 Sep; 73(3):292. PubMed ID: 681653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regulating human gene therapy: legislative overreaction to human subject protection failures.
    Leavitt WJ
    Adm Law Rev; 2001; 53(1):315-41. PubMed ID: 16189905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Congress tightens fetal research.
    Conn Med; 1984 Jan; 48(1):49. PubMed ID: 11644137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Proposals for improving the Peer Review System of the National Institutes of Health.
    Kirschstein RL
    Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 10304717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conducting empirical research on informed consent: challenges and questions.
    Sachs GA; Hougham GW; Sugarman J; Agre P; Broome ME; Geller G; Kass N; Kodish E; Mintz J; Roberts LW; Sankar P; Siminoff LA; Sorenson J; Weiss A
    IRB; 2003; Suppl 25(5):S4-S10. PubMed ID: 14870730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.