These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4553803)

  • 1. Effect of type of enrichment and duration of incubation on salmonella recovery from meat-and-bone meal.
    Huhtanen CN; Naghski J
    Appl Microbiol; 1972 Mar; 23(3):578-85. PubMed ID: 4553803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficiency of Salmonella isolation from meat-and-bone meal of one 300-g sample versus ten 30-g samples.
    Huhtanen CN; Naghski J; Dellamonica ES
    Appl Microbiol; 1972 Apr; 23(4):688-92. PubMed ID: 4553137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of several methods for the isolation of salmonellae from egg products.
    van Schothorst M; van Leusden FM
    Can J Microbiol; 1975 Jul; 21(7):1041-5. PubMed ID: 1097076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ICMSF methods studies. IX. The influence of selective enrichment broths, differential planting media, and incubation temperatues on the detection of Salmonella in dried foods and feed ingredients.
    Gabis DA; Silliker JH
    Can J Microbiol; 1977 Sep; 23(9):1225-31. PubMed ID: 907918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Limitations of lysine-iron-cystine-neutral red broth in the presumptive identification of Salmonella.
    D'Aoust JY
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1977 Nov; 34(5):595-6. PubMed ID: 931379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A comparison of methods for the enrichment of Salmonellae from human feces].
    Müller HE
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Nov; 253(2):183-96. PubMed ID: 6762012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of standard cultural methods for the detection of foodborne Salmonella species including three new chromogenic plating media.
    Schönenbrücher V; Mallinson ET; Bülte M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 123(1-2):61-6. PubMed ID: 18192050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of fluorescent-antibody methods and enrichment serology for the detection of Salmonella.
    Mohr HK; Trenk HL; Yeterian M
    Appl Microbiol; 1974 Feb; 27(2):324-8. PubMed ID: 4595958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Salmonella serotypes encountered in animal feed additives in Lebanon.
    Nabbut NH
    Am J Vet Res; 1978 May; 39(5):893-5. PubMed ID: 365032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The moroccan food snail, Helix aspersa, as a source of Salmonella.
    Andrews WH; Wilson CR; Romero A; Poelma PL
    Appl Microbiol; 1975 Mar; 29(3):328-30. PubMed ID: 1115505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative efficacies of selenite and tetrathionate enrichment broths for the isolation of Salmonella serotypes.
    Carlson VL; Snoeyenbos GH
    Am J Vet Res; 1974 May; 35(5):711-8. PubMed ID: 4830440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of selenite F, Muller-Kauffmann tetrathionate and Rappaport's medium for salmonella isolation from chicken giblets after pre-enrichment in buffered peptone water.
    Harvey RW; Price TH
    J Hyg (Lond); 1981 Oct; 87(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 7026671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examination of poultry litter for Salmonellae by direct culture and fluorescent antibody technique.
    Smyser CF; Snoeyenbos GH
    Avian Dis; 1976; 20(3):545-51. PubMed ID: 786247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparative efficacies of selenite and tetrathionate broth and Leifson- and Wilson-Blair agar for the isolation of salmonellae (author's transl)].
    Müller HE
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980 Nov; 248(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 7223120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of secondary enrichment for detecting Salmonellae in bobwhite quail.
    Pourciau SS; Springer WT
    Avian Dis; 1978; 22(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 348190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of methods for the isolation of Salmonella from imported frog legs.
    Andrews WH; Wilson CR; Poelma PL; Romero A
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1977 Jan; 33(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 319756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative effectiveness of selenite cystine broth, tetrathionate broth, and Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium for the recovery of Salmonella from raw flesh and other highly contaminated foods: precollaborative study.
    June GA; Sherrod PS; Hammack TS; Amaguana RM; Andrews WH
    J AOAC Int; 1995; 78(2):375-80. PubMed ID: 7756852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A rapid, presumptive procedure for the detection of Salmonella in foods and food ingredients.
    Hoben DA; Ashton DH; Peterson AC
    Appl Microbiol; 1973 Jan; 25(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 4568884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Salmonellae as an index of pollution of surface waters.
    Cherry WB; Hanks JB; Thomason BM; Murlin AM; Biddle JW; Croom JM
    Appl Microbiol; 1972 Sep; 24(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 4562473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of enrichment media and incubation conditions on isolating salmonellae from ground-meat filtrate.
    Kafel S; Bryan FL
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1977 Sep; 34(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 911161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.