These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4555787)

  • 1. Comparative validities of direct and indirect personality tests.
    Scott WA; Johnson RC
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1972 Jun; 38(3):301-18. PubMed ID: 4555787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct versus indirect personality assessment: evidence and implications.
    Mischel W
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1972 Jun; 38(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 4555788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determinants of differential test validity.
    Scott WA; Johnson RC
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1972 Jun; 38(3):327-8. PubMed ID: 4555790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Opinions predict opinions: so what else is new?
    McClelland DC
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1972 Jun; 38(3):325-6. PubMed ID: 4555789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An examination of impulsivity as a trait characterizing delinquent youth.
    Saunders JT; Reppucci ND; Sarata BP
    Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1973 Oct; 43(5):789-95. PubMed ID: 4742820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. INDIRECT ASSESSMENT OF ANGER DISPOSITIONS.
    LOY DL; TURNBULL JW
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1964 Sep; 28():314-21. PubMed ID: 14210880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between self-concept and the Draw-A-Person test.
    Schaefer W
    J Clin Psychol; 1975 Jan; 31(1):135-6. PubMed ID: 1089680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. RELATION BETWEEN BARRIER SCORES AND AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR.
    MEGARGEE EI
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1965 Aug; 70():307-11. PubMed ID: 14341716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Williams Scale for the Specification of Position: an initial report.
    Williams RM; Cooper LM
    J Psychol; 1972 Nov; 82(2d Half):241-51. PubMed ID: 4655556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The "Barnum effect" and acceptance of negative personal evaluation.
    Dmitruk VM; Collins RW; Clinger DL
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1973 Oct; 41(2):192-4. PubMed ID: 4583881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Self-Puzzle: a diagnostic and therapeutic tool.
    Loo CM
    J Pers Assess; 1974 Jun; 38(3):236-42. PubMed ID: 4605374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Frustration reactions of juvenile delinquents in the Rosenzweig Picture-Frustration Test. A methodological-clinical contribution on the psychology of delinquents with use of configuration frequency analysis].
    Rauchfleisch U
    Z Klin Psychol Psychother; 1973; 21(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 4614603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acceptance of personality interpretations as a function of assessment procedures.
    Snyder CR
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1974 Feb; 42(1):150. PubMed ID: 4592134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. COMPARISON OF IMPULSE, EGO, AND SUPEREGO FUNCTIONS IN BETTER ADJUSTED AND MORE POORLY ADJUSTED DELINQUENT ADOLESCENT GIRLS.
    SIGNORI EI; SMORDIN MM; REMPEL H; SAMPSON DL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1964 Apr; 18():485-8. PubMed ID: 14166042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human figure drawing characteristics related to juvenile delinquents.
    Montague DJ; Prytula RE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Apr; 40(2):623-30. PubMed ID: 1101186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The performance of juvenile delinquents on the Holtzman inkblot technique: a normative study.
    Megargee EI
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1965 Dec; 29(4):504-12. PubMed ID: 5320718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Test equivalence of projective and structured self-concept instruments.
    Stratton JR; Spitzer SP
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1966 Oct; 30(5):456-9. PubMed ID: 5339576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self-images without awareness and projective methods of personality assessment.
    Schlicht WJ; Carlson HJ; Skeen DR; Skurdal MA
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1969 Oct; 33(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 4901014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Further research on personality organization using the Differential Diagnostic Technique.
    Weininger O; Erdman JE; Ammons WJ
    Psychol Rep; 1993 Dec; 73(3 Pt 2):1247-50. PubMed ID: 8115578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Item content of the Group Personality Projective Test.
    Boudreaux RF; Dreger RM
    J Pers Assess; 1974 Dec; 38(6):551-5. PubMed ID: 4155439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.