These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4556216)

  • 1. [Counting technic for urinary bacteria].
    Petithory JC
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1972 Mar; 20(5):323-8. PubMed ID: 4556216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting the reliability of screening tests for bacteriuria. II. Dip-slide: false positive results following postal transport and false negatives owing to incubation at room temperature.
    Alwall N
    Acta Med Scand; 1973 Jun; 193(6):505-9. PubMed ID: 4578834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Determination of bacteriuria using uricult, a new formula].
    Maugeri TL; Cefali M; Galletti G
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1973 Dec; 9(4):950-63. PubMed ID: 4605607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation of a new urine collection-culture tube with the standard loop technique.
    Martin LP; Ahmed M
    Am J Med Technol; 1974 Mar; 40(3):135-7. PubMed ID: 4592623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The fallacy of cultures of the tips of Foley catheters.
    Gross PA; Harkauy LM; Barden GE; Kerstein M
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1974 Oct; 139(4):597-8. PubMed ID: 4608141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Urinary anaerobic bacteria in urinary tract infections].
    Caselitz FH; Freitag V; Kreitz T; Rheinwald E
    Munch Med Wochenschr; 1970 Oct; 112(43):1940-2. PubMed ID: 5536377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Bacteriuria: importance and value of the semi-quantitative method of Uricult. Comparative study].
    Dayer JM; Humair L
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1972 Mar; 61(12):384-8. PubMed ID: 4553474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Quantitative bacteriological method for diagnosis of urinary tract infections].
    Popović Z; Gojak Z
    Med Arh; 1971; 25(3):19-24. PubMed ID: 4950162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The optimal and effective evaluation of bacteriological urinary findings].
    Breitfellner G
    Urologe; 1970 Sep; 9(5):287-9. PubMed ID: 4920524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bacturcult and routine culture procedure--a comparative study in urinary tract infection.
    Arya D; Chitkara NL; Ganguly NK
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1976 Jan; 19(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 789236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Demonstrations of urinary tract infections using uricult].
    Hellwig I
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1972 Nov; 97(44):1687-9. PubMed ID: 4565248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Urine culture in a urology service].
    Aguinaga S; Guachalla H
    Hospital (Rio J); 1969 Aug; 76(2):353-9. PubMed ID: 4900403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Results and experiences in the diagnosis of bacteriuria with Uricult].
    Brühl P; Adams E; Straube W
    Urologe; 1971 Jan; 10(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 4931364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Urinary bacterial levels and urinary leukocyte count and Gram bacterioscopy as indices of infection in normal students of both sexes].
    Pabst PA; Collares LB; Gerk JR; Guimarães OR; Grello RR; Moraes AM; Cordeiro Hde A; Suassuna I
    Hospital (Rio J); 1970 Aug; 78(2):477-90. PubMed ID: 4929689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The dip slide--a simple method for determination of bacterial count in the urine].
    Biechteler W; Haas F
    Munch Med Wochenschr; 1970 May; 112(19):883-7. PubMed ID: 4911081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparative study of Bacturcult with culture and recount of bacterial colonies in the urine].
    Saieh C; Zilleruelo G; Puga F
    Rev Chil Pediatr; 1977; 48(3-4):131-3. PubMed ID: 360317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Extra-laboratory determinations of bacteriuria in urologic patients by means of a screening quantitative bacteriological test in the light of 500 examined cases].
    Modliński L
    Pol Przegl Chir; 1974 Oct; 46(10A):1389-97. PubMed ID: 4610540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative study of the results of the detection of bacteriuria using the AUTOBAC apparatus and the classical method].
    Mathieu D; Doucet-Populaire F; Jacques L
    Biomed Pharmacother; 1986; 40(5):188-90. PubMed ID: 3539221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative culture of urine. A comparative study of semiquantitative method with the quantitative pour plate method.
    Deshmukh CK; Sharma KD
    Indian J Pathol Bacteriol; 1970 Jan; 13(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 4924949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Clinical evaluation of nitrite test for the detection of bacteriuria].
    Ozeki S; Kawamura T; Nishino Y; Ishihara S; Ban Y; Kawada Y
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1997 Dec; 43(12):861-5. PubMed ID: 9488933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.