129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4557034)
1. Burst abdomen.
Br Med J; 1972 Jul; 3(5817):4-5. PubMed ID: 4557034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Burst abdomen. A preventable complication, monolayer closure of the abdominal incision with monofilament nylon.
Mathur SK
J Postgrad Med; 1983 Oct; 29(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 6368809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical factors influencing the incidence of burst abdomen.
Niggebrugge AH; Hansen BE; Trimbos JB; van de Velde CJ; Zwaveling A
Eur J Surg; 1995 Sep; 161(9):655-61. PubMed ID: 8541424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abdominal wound dehiscence.
Hugh TB
Aust N Z J Surg; 1990 Mar; 60(3):153-5. PubMed ID: 2183750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abdominal wound closure.
Carlson DC; Wornom IL; Aldrete JS
Ala J Med Sci; 1984 Jan; 21(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 6367517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Wound disruption.
Lacey CG; Morrow CP; Disaia PJ; Townsend DE
Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Dec; 48(6):730. PubMed ID: 792759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Burst abdomen--a preventable condition.
Br Med J; 1977 Mar; 1(6063):771-2. PubMed ID: 322797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Primary abdominal wound closure with permanent, continuous running monofilament sutures.
Archie JP; Feldtman RW
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Nov; 153(5):721-2. PubMed ID: 7027500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Closing of median laparotomies: interrupted versus continuous sutures using slow absorption thread].
Meyer P
Helv Chir Acta; 1984 Jun; 51(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 6381423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Burst abdomen--a preventable condition.
Br Med J; 1977 Feb; 1(6060):534. PubMed ID: 843793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Retention mesh: an alternative to retention sutures.
Yüce K
Eur J Surg; 1994 Nov; 160(11):641-2. PubMed ID: 7858050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Importance of mechanical factors in the development of abdomial wound dehiscence. Tensile strength of the human and animal fascia with regard to various suture-materials].
Tauber R; Seidel W
Zentralbl Chir; 1975; 100(19):1178-82. PubMed ID: 132828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abdominal wound closure. A comparison of polydioxanone, polypropylene, and Teflon-coated braided Dacron sutures.
Kon ND; Meredith JW; Poole GV; Martin MB; Kawamoto E; Myers RT
Am Surg; 1984 Oct; 50(10):549-51. PubMed ID: 6237599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Closure of burst abdomen after major gastrointestinal operations--comparison of different surgical techniques and later development of incisional hernia.
Gislason H; Viste A
Eur J Surg; 1999 Oct; 165(10):958-61. PubMed ID: 10574104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Elimination of disruption of abdominal incisions.
Lord JW; Pfeffer RB; Golomb FM
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1969 Oct; 129(4):758-60. PubMed ID: 4898093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Management of wound ruptures].
Ermisch J
Zentralbl Chir; 1986; 111(6):363-5. PubMed ID: 3521146
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abdominal wound dehiscence.
Reitamo J; Möller C
Acta Chir Scand; 1972; 138(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 4556479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The causes of abdominal wound disruption.
Alexander HC; Prudden JF
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1966 Jun; 122(6):1223-9. PubMed ID: 5328836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. No more abdominal wound dehiscences.
Stokes TL; Old L
Va Med Mon (1918); 1969 Sep; 96(9):506-13 passim. PubMed ID: 4899832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia after major gastrointestinal operations--comparison of three closure techniques.
Gislason H; Grønbech JE; Søreide O
Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):349-54. PubMed ID: 7662780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]