115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4560506)
1. Immune response against hamster erythrocytes in the low-responder mouse strains. 3. Antibody production in the reversed combination of low-responder C57BL-6 mice as donors of antigens and golden hamsters as hosts.
Nomoto K; Yamada H; Takeya K
Jpn J Microbiol; 1972 May; 16(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 4560506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Immune response against hamster erythrocytes in the low-responder mouse strains. VII. Competitive suppression of antibody production against hamster erythrocytes by the simultaneous development of a delayed hypersensitivity against the antigen.
Nomoto K; Kuroiwa A; Mashiba H; Takeya K
Jpn J Microbiol; 1973 May; 17(3):163-72. PubMed ID: 4541933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Immune response against hamster erythrocytes in the low-responder mouse strains. VIII. Differentiation of T lymphocytes into effector cells in delayed hypersensitivity and helper cells in antibody production.
Nomoto K; Yamada H; Mashiba H; Takeya K
Jpn J Microbiol; 1974 Mar; 18(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 4610236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Responses of athymic ("nude") mice to sheep red blood cells.
Pantelouris EM; Flisch PA
Eur J Immunol; 1972 Jun; 2(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 4569169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Immune response against hamster erythrocytes in the low-responder mouse strains. I. Strain difference in the antibody response to primary antigenic stimulation and its disappearance after pre-sensitization with the antigen in Freund's complete adjuvant.
Nomoto K; Mashiba H; Takeya K
Jpn J Microbiol; 1972 Jan; 16(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 4556978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Immune response against hamster erythrocytes in the low-responder mouse strains. IV. Delayed hypersensitivity against solubilized hamster erythrocytes in mice.
Nomoto K; Makidono R; Takeya K
Jpn J Microbiol; 1972 Sep; 16(5):415-23. PubMed ID: 4539622
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Immunologic response of AKR mice in different phases of development of transplanted gross leukemia. II. Comparative investigation of cellular and humoral antibody formation.
Golubska B; Szalaty H; Stelmachowska A; Skurska Z
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 1971; 19(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 4938012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Immune response against hamster erythrocytes in the low-responder mouse strains. X. Proliferation of antibody-forming cells after antigenic stimulation of mice with different activities of thymus-derived lymphocytes.
Nomoto K; Mashiba H; Sato M; Takeya K
Jpn J Microbiol; 1974 Jul; 18(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 4610239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Immune response against hamster erythrocytes in the low-responder mouse strains. II. Effects of pre-sensitization with hamster lymphoma cells on antibody production against hamster erythrocytes.
Nomoto K; Kuroiwa A; Takeya K
Jpn J Microbiol; 1972 Mar; 16(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 4560584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimation of PFC and serum haemolysin response to SRBC in 'nude' mice.
Pantelouris EM; Flisch PA
Immunology; 1972 Jan; 22(1):159-64. PubMed ID: 4552228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of antilymphocytic antibody on the humoral immune response in different strains of mice. II. The response to sheep erythrocytes.
Ghaffar A; James K
Immunology; 1973 Mar; 24(3):455-65. PubMed ID: 4574575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The immune response to sheep erythrocytes in the lizard Calotes versicolor.
Kanakambika P; Muthukkaruppan V
J Immunol; 1972 Sep; 109(3):415-9. PubMed ID: 4560080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Paradoxical cellular and serologic responses following antigenic competition.
Merchant B; Liacopoulos P
Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol; 1972; 42(4):516-32. PubMed ID: 4555270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the immune response to sheep erythrocytes, tetanus toxoid and endotoxin in different strains of mice.
Borel JF
Agents Actions; 1974 Oct; 4(4):277-85. PubMed ID: 4614659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Immunosuppression by leukemia viruses. V. Ultrastructural studies of antibody-forming spleensof mice infected with Friend leukemia virus.
Koo GC; Ceglowski WS; Friedman H
J Immunol; 1971 Mar; 106(3):799-814. PubMed ID: 4323132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A kinetic and genetic study of the cellular and humoral immune response in pigs after immunization with sheep erythrocytes.
Buschmann H; Schumann H
Z Immunitatsforsch Exp Klin Immunol; 1971; 141(3):211-22. PubMed ID: 4251864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary and secondary immune response kinetics in the Syrian hamster.
Erb P; Lazàry S; Loeffler H
Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol; 1972; 42(3):362-72. PubMed ID: 4553433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Antibody production in rats treated with endotoxin.
Merétey K; Elekes E; Bertók L
Ann Immunol Hung; 1973; 17():suppl 63-6. PubMed ID: 4618443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Obesity and antibody production. Investigations on C57Bl-7J mice].
Finger H; Rakow L; Beneke G
Pathol Microbiol (Basel); 1971; 37(6):449-58. PubMed ID: 4945135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Rate of hemolytic antibody production by single cells in vivo in rabbits.
Conrad RE; Ingraham JS
J Immunol; 1974 Jan; 112(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 4590818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
