These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4562938)

  • 1. Situational variables and performance on Machover's figure-drawing test.
    Dmitruk VM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Oct; 35(2):489-90. PubMed ID: 4562938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Note on the validity of Machover's indicators of anxiety.
    Johnson JH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Aug; 33(1):126. PubMed ID: 4937867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sex, sex role identification, and college students' projective drawings.
    Aronoff DN; McCormick NB
    J Clin Psychol; 1990 Jul; 46(4):460-6. PubMed ID: 2212050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [An attempted comparative analysis of the body image in obese and thin children by Machover's method (human figure drawing)].
    Mazzarella B; De Renzis G; Tatafiore E
    Rass Int Clin Ter; 1968 Jun; 48(12):747-55. PubMed ID: 4899413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Application of Machover's test of drawn figures to a group of boys with strong sexual activity].
    Nava V
    Riv Sper Freniatr Med Leg Alien Ment; 1965 Dec; 89(6):1560-9. PubMed ID: 5327784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A variation of the Fay test after study of Karen Machover's test].
    Rossetti M
    Riv Sper Freniatr Med Leg Alien Ment; 1967 Dec; 91(6):1437-51. PubMed ID: 4896212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marital status and figure drawing choice in normal young adults.
    Gravitz MA
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1967 Aug; 31(4):86-7. PubMed ID: 4860449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Normal adult differentiation patterns on the figure drawing test.
    Gravitz MA
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1966 Oct; 30(5):471-3. PubMed ID: 5339578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gender, gender role, and drawing skill.
    Sappington J; Martin J; Smith E; Cowan M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Feb; 82(1):283-8. PubMed ID: 8668491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Personality variables in Rorschach scoring.
    Voigt WH
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1966 Apr; 30(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 5326002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Upper left hand placement of human figure drawings as an indicator of anxiety.
    Johnson JH
    J Pers Assess; 1971 Aug; 35(4):336-7. PubMed ID: 4935853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Alexithymic characteristics in responses to the Synthetic House-Tree-Person (HTP) Drawing Test.
    Fukunishi I; Mikami N; Kikuchi M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Dec; 85(3 Pt 1):939-42. PubMed ID: 9399302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Figure-drawing indices of psychological accessibility.
    Craig RJ; Olson RE; Saad S
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Dec; 91(3 Pt 2):1213-21. PubMed ID: 12585540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Differential Diagnostic Technique, a visual motor projective test.
    Weininger O
    Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Aug; 65(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 3317268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. House-Tree-Person drawings and personality traits.
    Marzolf SS; Kirchner JH
    J Pers Assess; 1972 Apr; 36(2):148-65. PubMed ID: 4552615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The IES test and a performance measure of intelligence.
    Bortner RW
    Percept Mot Skills; 1966 Feb; 22(1):171-5. PubMed ID: 5324737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of three methods for scoring figure drawings.
    Shaffer JW; Duszynski KR; Thomas CB
    J Pers Assess; 1984 Jun; 48(3):245-54. PubMed ID: 6379144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structural analysis: a theory of personality based on projective techniques.
    Wagner EE
    J Pers Assess; 1971 Oct; 35(5):422-35. PubMed ID: 4939788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Raw scores vs percentage conversions in factorial solutions for projective test variables.
    Wagner EE; Hilsenroth MJ; Sivec HJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Dec; 71(3 Pt 1):827-31. PubMed ID: 2293185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hand Test and the High School Personality Questionnaire: structural analysis.
    McGiboney GW; Carter C; Jones W
    Percept Mot Skills; 1984 Feb; 58(1):287-90. PubMed ID: 6371701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.