These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 457053)

  • 1. Supreme Court ruling says criminal standard of proof unnecessary for commitment.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1979 Aug; 30(8):573, 577, 581. PubMed ID: 457053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Supreme Court and madness: a middle ground on proof of mental illness for commitment.
    Curran WJ
    N Engl J Med; 1979 Aug; 301(6):317-8. PubMed ID: 450018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mental health courts and the lesson learned in juvenile court.
    Grudzinskas AJ; Clayfield JC
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 15515908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Court orders hearings in hospital transfers.
    McDonald MC
    Psychiatr News; 1980 Jun; 15(12):1, 12. PubMed ID: 10247416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New develpments in civil commitment of the mentally ill. Impact for patient, family, and psychiatrist.
    Williams PW
    JAMA; 1979 Nov; 242(21):2307-9. PubMed ID: 490828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [On the relationship between psychiatry and criminal law from a legal standpoint].
    Schöch H
    Nervenarzt; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1382-8. PubMed ID: 16247618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Landmark?: United States Supreme Court recognized the issue of the constitutional rights of civilly committed mental patients.
    Brown A
    J Am Health Care Assoc; 1976 Jan; 2(1):10. PubMed ID: 10246882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Still stuck in the cuckoo's nest: why do courts continue to rely on antiquated mental illness research?
    Davoli JI
    Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(4):987-1050. PubMed ID: 15295857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
    Klein DW
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Formal commitment hearings not necessary for children, Supreme Court rulings say.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1979 Sep; 30(9):645, 649. PubMed ID: 468145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Supreme Court rules on commitment.
    Herrington BS
    Psychiatr News; 1979 May; 14(10):1, 14-6. PubMed ID: 10241478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Après the acquittal, le deluge: release procedures and allocation of the burden of proof in subsequent review hearings following a finding of "not guilty by reason of insanity" in State of New Jersey v. Hetra Fields.
    Perlin ML
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1979; 7(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 508963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ["Ill or healthy" in the view of forensic psychiatry. What does the law say?].
    Kristiansson M; Andiné P
    Lakartidningen; 2008 Apr 9-15; 105(15):1085-6. PubMed ID: 18561750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Civil commitment of American Indians.
    Bloom JD; Manson SM; Neligh G
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1980; 8(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 7225592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legal eye.
    Spencer-Lane T
    Ment Health Today; 2011 Feb; ():26. PubMed ID: 21374874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Law-medicine notes. The right to psychiatric treatment: a "simple decision" in the Supreme Court.
    Curran WJ
    N Engl J Med; 1975 Sep; 293(10):487-8. PubMed ID: 1152864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Result of urgent investigation into the actual condition of serious criminal patients hospitalized after psychiatric evaluation in conformity with the mental health welfare law].
    Tsukue I; Konuma K
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2002; 104(1):86-97. PubMed ID: 11928317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Virginia Commitment Law: clinical characteristics of patients hospitalized involuntarily by court order.
    LeBuffe FP; Granger SI; Wise TN
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1979; 7(4):411-21. PubMed ID: 551838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Sanctions concerning mentally disturbed criminals. Let the courts be fully responsible for the length of the commitment].
    Boerman AJ
    Lakartidningen; 1999 Apr; 96(16):1940-1. PubMed ID: 10330858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing competency to stand trial: a case study of technology diffusion in four states.
    Schreiber J
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1978; 6(4):439-57. PubMed ID: 752385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.